Grants and Contracts Details
Description
ARPA-E Control Number 2707-1555, University of Kentucky, Honaker
Development of a Carbon-Negative Process for Comminution Energy Reduction and
Energy-Relevant Mineral Extraction through Carbon Mineralization and Biological
Carbon Fixation
Lead Organization: University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
Principal Investigator: Rick Honaker, Ph.D.
Technical category: 1 and 2
Proposed Funding Requested: $5,000,000 Federal and $1,250,000 Cost Share
Project Duration: 36 months
Concept Summary
The proposed concept utilizes supercritical CO2 (sCO2) to pretreat the CO2 reactive minerals
in the host rock and tailing material associated with energy-relevant minerals prior to grinding.
Subsequently, CO2 saturated liquid will be utilized during grinding in a pre-treatment mill to
further assist mineral carbonation by exposing CO2 to fresh surfaces. By converting the CO2
reactive mineral from silicates to carbonates, the bond work index of the ore reduces from 18-20
kWh/t to 10-12 kWh/t, which significantly reduces the specific energy consumption by nearly 50%.
The energy-relevant minerals will then be recovered using the HydroFloatTM separator, which is a
novel fluidized-bed flotation system developed specifically to recover coarse particles containing
small amounts of exposed hydrophobic surfaces that cannot be recovered using a conventional
flotation system. This will allow mineral particles discharged from the pretreatment mill to be in
a much coarser size range (1 – 0.15 mm), which significantly reduces the comminution energy
needed for mineral recovery. The proposed work will also look into enhancing the hydrophobicity
of the targeted minerals through advanced chemistry to improve the recovery of low-degree
liberation particles. The energy-relevant mineral recovered from the HydroFloat can be fed into a
ball mill and then recovered using a conventional flotation system. Since the load of the material
fed to the ball mill is significantly reduced due to the rejection of non-valuable minerals by the
HydroFloat, the energy consumption per ton of the energy-relevant mineral recovered is reduced
substantially. Alternatively, for energy-relevant sulfide minerals (i.e. chalcopyrite and spherite),
the mineral recovered from the HydroFloat can be directly leached through a bioleaching system
using bacteria such as acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. The bacteria will selectively dissolve sulfide
minerals dispersed in gangue material. The CO2 released from carbonate ore will be captured and
consumed in the bioleaching system by serving as a nutrient for bacteria growth, which leads to
biological carbon fixation. Overall, the proposed process achieves carbon negative emissions.
Innovation and Impact
Comminution liberates valuable minerals from gangue minerals by concentrating stresses
around the boundaries between the valuable and non-valuable minerals. Sufficient liberation is a
prerequisite for obtaining high-grade mineral concentrates from ores at high recovery values. As
such, comminution dictates the efficiency of overall mineral processing circuits. Comminution
consumes up to 4% of electrical energy globally, and about 50% of mine site energy consumption1.
Therefore, it is critical to develop innovative technologies to reduce the energy consumption of
comminution without impairing efficiency. During the comminution process, ore particles are
broken by impact, compression, and/or attrition. Ore particles are easier to comminute when
fractures (flaws) exist, which can be classified into interfacial fracture, interphase fracture, and
1 Jeswiet J., Szekeres A., 2016. Procedia CIRP, 48, 140-145.
1
ARPA-E Control Number 2707-1555, University of Kentucky, Honaker
inner phase fracture. The three types of fractures are defined as cracking along the boundary
between two different rocks, the boundary between two different mineral phases, and a boundary
in a pure, single-phase mineral, respectively. Technologies that promote the formation of fractures,
preferably interphase type, will reduce comminution energy consumption by increasing the
particle size needed to achieve the required degree of liberation.
Ore particles consist of different types of
minerals, some of which are CO2 reactive and
some are CO2 inert. Thus, different minerals in
the same ore react differently with CO2, leading
to the generation of flaws and fractures in the
particle. Based on this fact, we propose to use
CO2 to reduce comminution energy. This
concept can be incorporated into existing
comminution circuits in three different ways: Figure 1. Comminution energy reduction by
ex-situ (pretreatment prior to grinding), in-situ carbonation.
(concurrent with grinding), and ex-situ plus in-
situ (Figure 1). Several findings from prior studies suggest the viability of using CO2 to reduce ore
comminution energy: (1) CO2-reactive mineral surfaces rapidly carbonated with wet supercritical
CO2 (sCO2) in less than 1 hour2; (2) carbonation creates lattice defects in CO2-reactive minerals,
and lattice defects are more likely carbonated relative the whole mineral3; and (3) mechanical
grinding while carbonation can increase the carbonation yield and improve particle size reduction4.
The main purpose of comminution in mineral
processing is to liberate the valuable mineral particle
from the gangue material to allow physical separation.
Conventional froth flotation is a commonly applied
technology to separate particles based on their surface
hydrophobicity characteristics, which typically
requires particles to be ground to a top size of 150-200
µm to achieve 80% liberation. To overcome this limit,
a novel separator HydroFloatTM was developed which
integrates the froth flotation technique within a
fluidized bed technology. Due to low turbulent
conditions, coarse particles containing poorly liberated
valuable minerals with less than 10% hydrophobic
surface exposure can be floated with the assistance of
fluidized water (Figure 2). This technology has been Figure 2. Recovery of particles with different
successfully applied to industrial minerals with several exposed target mineral surface areas. 5
full-scale units demonstrated to recover particles larger
than 3 mm. Results show that sulfide mineral recovery increased 15 times for the 1x0.85 mm
particles by using a HydroFloatTM separator compared to a conventional flotation cell.5 As such,
the amount of the material that is fed to the downstream grinding circuit can be reduced
2 Schaef et al., 2013. Environmental Science & Technology, 47, 174-181.
3 Kwak et al., 2010. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 114(9), 4126-4134.
4 Julcour et al., 2015. Chemical Engineering Journal, 262, 716-726.
5 Miller et al., 2016. IMPC Conference paper.
2
ARPA-E Control Number 2707-1555, University of Kentucky, Honaker
substantially thus reducing the overall comminution energy needed to recover nearly 100% of the
targeted mineral. In addition, the unliberated minerals may occur as micro dispersed crystals in the
particle which may require specifically designed collectors to enhance the surface hydrophobicity
by crosslinking the micro dispersed crystal sites on the particle surface, which improves recovery
of energy relevant mineral finely dispersed in the CO2 reactive host rock.
Recently, mineral leaching with the assistance of microorganisms has been intensively studied
due to its great potential in metal extraction processes that can lead to sustainable mining and
metallurgical processes. Bioleaching has been demonstrated and utilized in an industrial scale to
extract valuable material from mine tailings, low-grade ore, mineral concentrate, etc. It can be
achieved through direct contact and indirect contact bioleaching. For instance, the leaching of low-
grade sulfide minerals such as chalcopyrite is usually retarded by the formation of a passive layer
consisting of element sulfur, copper polysulfide, or iron sulfate
precipitates. Direct bioleaching using Acidthiobacillus spp. bacteria
is a great alternative to resolve the issue. The bacteria reacts with the
sulfur existing in sulfides minerals like chalcopyrite which releases
copper into the solution. Acid production also occurs through
oxidation of ferrous to ferric and sulfur to sulfates, which further
enhances the kinetics of the metal extraction process. 6 Previous
research showed that by temperature optimization and the dissolved
oxygen level in the bioreactor, the acid generation process can be
expedited to two days. The advantage of using bioleaching to extract
energy relevant minerals from sulfides and carbonated ore is the role
of CO2 in bioleaching process. A study showed that concentration of
CO2 greatly improves the growth and activity of bioleaching
microorganisms by improving the iron oxidizing bacteria to increase
the leaching kinetics of Cu from copper sulfide mineral7. The carbon
fixation in the bioleaching system is demonstrated in Figure 3. This Figure 3. Carbon fixation in
enables the re-capture of CO2 from leaching the carbonates and the bioleaching system. 7
carbonated gangue mineral associated with energy-relevant minerals.
Proposed Work
The project proposes to test the concept on two different feedstocks: chalcopyrite ore from the
Bingham Canyon ore and bastnasite ore from Mountain Pass, which is the only rare earth mine in
the United States. Rio Tinto’s Bingham Canyon resource contains a significant amount of
plagioclase assemblage CO2 reactive mineral in the host rock while the Mountain Pass deposit
contains 10-15% of CO2 reactive minerals. The proposed work will be conducted over a three-year
project period with the first two years focused on laboratory and bench-top testing followed by
pilot-scale testing of the favorable portions of the concept in the third year.
Project tasks include: Task 1: Supercritical CO2 and saturated CO2 liquid treatment. The task
will assess the degree of mineral carbonation by optimizing the sCO2 treatment condition and CO2
liquid-assisted grinding operation. Task 2: Comminution energy assessment. The task will assess
the grindability alteration of ore after sCO2 treatment, mineralogical determination, and liberation
6 Zhou et al., 2018. Minerals, 8, 596
7 Guezennec et al. 2018. Hydrometallurgy, 180, 277-286.
3
ARPA-E Control Number 2707-1555, University of Kentucky, Honaker
Targets State of the art Technology Proposed Technology
Carbon ? Carbon mineralization by CO2 ? The kinetics of carbonation using
Mineralization injection in rock
supercritical CO2 is much faster.
? Olivine: 0.05 ton of CO2 ? Olivine: 0.075 ton of CO2 uptake per
uptake per ton of ore (10- ton of ore per hour.
micron grain size) per year.
Comminution ? Bond work index (Wi) for ? Reduce Bond work index of ore by
silicate ore is typically 18-20 40-50% through carbonation using
kWh/t (i.e. andesite, olivine.) sCO2 and liquid CO2.
? Innovative mill design to ? Using Hydrofloat to recover energy
optimize charge and slurry relative mineral at low degree of
motion in mill. liberation and reduce the load feeding
? Optimize stirred speed, pulp into the comminution circuit
density, fluid viscosity, and ? Reduce energy consumption of
grinding media etc. grinding by >50%
Mineral ? Froth flotation typically ? Hydrofloat increases recovery of
Recovery
require particle size of 100– unliberated energy relative mineral
200-microns. by >50%
? Using bioleaching to enhance metal
recovery from low-grade minerals.
Carbon Carbonate mineral ? Bio-assisted Carbon Fixation
Re-Capture ? Roast and air carbon capture ? Enhanced bacteria growth
degree of valuable/gangue minerals using a series of characterization tool (i.e., SEM, Micro CT,
etc.). Task 3: HydroFloatTM testing. This task will focus on evaluate and optimize mineral
separation efficiency to further reduce comminution energy and improve unliberated mineral
recovery using innovative chemicals under various liberation characterization and surface
exposure. Task 4: CO2 fixation in bioleaching. The task will assess the mass transfer of CO2 in
bioleaching reactors, and evaluate the effect of CO2 on bacteria growth, CO2 fixation rate, and
bioleaching kinetics. Task 5: Pilot testing of the favorable concept components in the third year
will be performed adjacent to mining processing operations. Task 6: TEA and Life Cycle Analysis.
Team Organization and Capabilities
The team consists of academic experts from the University of Kentucky (UKY), Virginia Tech
(VT), University of Utah (UU), and West Virginia University (WVU). Industrial partners include
Eriez Manufacturing (equipment), and Solvay (chemicals). The combined team has a vast array
of extractive metallurgy equipment at bench-scale and pilot-scale as well as the analytical tools
needed to complete the project tasks.
Dr. Rick Honaker (Professor, UKY) will serve as PI with over 35 years of extractive metallurgy
and large federally funded project management experience. Dr. Mike Free (Professor, UU) will
lead efforts on bioleaching and carbon fixation in bacteria. Dr. Xinbo Yang (Assistant Professor,
UKY) will focus on solution chemistry, mineral liberation, process design, and scale-up. Dr.
Wencai Zhang (Assistant Professor, VT) will lead carbonation and surface chemistry efforts. Dr.
Qingqing Huang (WVU) will work on comminution energy assessment.
4
ARPA-E Control Number 2707-1555, University of Kentucky, Honaker
APPENDIX 1: TECHNO-ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT
The schematic of the proposed process in this study is shown in Figure 4. Since the primary
and secondary crusher, rod mill, ball mill, and flotation unit are typically used in a preexisting
mineral beneficiation process, the scope
of this techno-economic assessment
primarily focuses on the operational costs
associated with the supercritical CO2
treatment system. The potential economic
gain of the proposed process is the
savings on energy reduction on
comminution and mineral recovery
improvement.
The primary operating cost of the Figure 4. Flowsheet
sCO2 system that will be developed in this
project to pretreat ore particles is associated with the electricity used in the pumps and heaters.
There is limited information reported for the techno-economic analysis of this kind of application
on carbon mineralization. However, based on existing TEA studies on the application of sCO2 in
the food industry, the operating cost is estimated to be as low as $1/ton depending on the operating
pressure, temperature, and residence time for treatment. The residence time reduces exponentially
with increased particle surface area when the flaws and fractures occur at the boundary of minerals
during treatment.
The specific energy (Eg, kWh/ton) requirement
for the comminution process is a function of the Bond
work index (Wi), feed and product particle size
expressed as F80 and P80 which is the size at which
80% of the material is passing. Assume 50% of the
ore is CO2 reactive minerals, and 50% of the ore is
non-CO2 reactive minerals. Assume the Wi for non-
reactive ore is 15 kWh/t. Converting the carbon
reactive mineral from silicates to carbonates, reduces
the bond work index from 20 kWh/t to 10 kWh/t. As
such, the overall Wi of the ore is reduced by 28%.
Combining the benefits of the sCO2 with those of the
HydroFloat as shown in Figure 5, the proposed Parameters Conventional HydroFloatTM
technology can potentially reduce the energy cost F80 (micron) 12000 12000
from $1.6/ton to $0.28/ton (@$0.1/kWh).
P80 (micron) 100 1000
Production of particles smaller than 10 microns to Wi (kWh/t) 17.5 12.5
achieve a targeted liberation point commonly results Eg (kWh/t) 16 2.8
Energy Cost $1.6/ton $0.28/ton
in recovery loss. Using the HyroFloat and /or Figure 5. Comminution cost reduction.
bioleaching can minimize the loss. Assuming the feed grade of copper is 0.5%, increasing the
recovery of copper from 80% to 100% will result in 1 kg of additional Cu recovered per ton of
feed ore. At a Cu price of $10.4/kg, additional product revenue of $10.4/ton of feed may be
generated using the proposed process. A similar result can be realized for the processing of
bastnaesite. In addition, other elemental byproducts may be generated in the process (Ni, Nb, etc).
5
Status | Active |
---|---|
Effective start/end date | 3/9/23 → 3/8/26 |
Funding
- Department of Energy: $3,500,000.00
Fingerprint
Explore the research topics touched on by this project. These labels are generated based on the underlying awards/grants. Together they form a unique fingerprint.