Grants and Contracts Details
Description
Using Edge-of-Field Data and Modeling to Inform H2Ohio
Eutrophication driven by excess nutrient loading to receiving waters may be the most rampant
global water quality issue facing society, leading to dire environmental, social and economic
consequences. Recently in the United States, a significant shift in freshwater streams and lakes from an
oligotrophic to mesotrophic, and mesotrophic to eutrophic states has been documented. In Lake Erie,
greater than 70% of phosphorus (P) delivery has been linked to nonpoint sources and has led to the
recurrence of harmful algal blooms (HABs). Significant voluntary, incentive, and regulatory efforts have
been focused on addressing agricultural phosphorus (P) loss within the Western Lake Erie Basin (WLEB)
watershed. The H2Ohio initiative was developed to promote conservation practice adoption to ensure
clean waters for Ohio. However, much of the data used to identify and promote the conservation
practices included in the 4R nutrient stewardship and H2Ohio frameworks were based on studies from
locations that did not have the unique heavy clay soils and intensive tile drainage found in the Ohio
WLEB watershed.
Direct quantitative measurements of agricultural management practice impacts on tile-drain
water quality at the field-scale is impractical across a broad array of landscapes due to economic and
logistical constraints. Process-based numerical models at the field-scale can aid in filling the gaps, but
often have uncertain parameters that require calibration and validation using long-term monitoring
records at specific sites. For this project, we will focus on numerical modeling of the USDA-ARS SDRU
edge-of-field (EOF) monitoring network in order to quantify 1) typical water quality loadings in tile-
drained landscapes as it pertains to landscape variability, and 2) nutrient load reduction potential for
prevailing water quality management practices such as drainage water management, subsurface
fertilizer placement, and cover crops.
Objective 1: We will select an appropriate field-scale model (e.g., APEX, DRAINMOD, RZWQM2, or field-
scale SWAT) to simulate hydrology and water quality dynamics across study sites in the USDA-ARS EOF
monitoring network that span typical soil texture gradients, soil nutrient levels, and prevailing cropping
practices of Ohio to obtain a baseline scenario. Uncertain hydrologic and water quality modeling
parameters will be calibrated for each site. Next, we will run a Monte Carlo (randomization) analysis to
simulate how various combinations of landscape variables (e.g., soil texture, soil nutrient levels, and
climate variables) impact annual nutrient loadings. We aim to develop nomographs to describe the
baseline relationships between area-normalized annual nutrient loadings and landscape variables. We
will consider uncertainty by considering ranges of calibrated model parameters from our initial model
evaluation analysis.
Objective 2: We will select four prevailing water quality management practices (initially nutrient
management planning/rate, subsurface placement, drainage water management, and conservation crop
rotation) that have been implemented in USDA-ARS SDRU before-after-control-impact (BACI) studies. As
additional practice data (i.e., VRT and manure incorporation) becomes available we have the potential
to project the impact of those practices as well since the modeling framework will be established. We
will initially evaluate the utility of our field-scale model to simulate practice impacts (e.g., drainage
water management). Based on findings, we may modify model formulations (as needed) to improve
representation of physical processes. Similar to Objective 1, uncertain model parameters will be
calibrated, in order to consider a realistic range for our uncertainty analysis. Agricultural management
practices will be incorporated into the Monte Carlo simulations and we will generate nomographs that
include anticipated nutrient loadings for sites when implementing prevailing agricultural water
management practices. Further, we will also present nomographs showing percent reductions from
baseline levels simulated.
Status | Active |
---|---|
Effective start/end date | 5/15/22 → 8/31/26 |
Funding
- Agricultural Research Service: $150,000.00
Fingerprint
Explore the research topics touched on by this project. These labels are generated based on the underlying awards/grants. Together they form a unique fingerprint.