A 2-year longitudinal randomized controlled trial examining the transfer of speed of processing training to secondary cognitive domains in middle-aged and older adults with HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder: Results of the think fast study

David E. Vance, Pariya L. Fazeli, Andres Azuero, Jennifer S. Frank, Virginia G. Wadley, James L. Raper, Caitlin N. Pope, Karlene K. Ball

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: As people with HIV (PWH) age, they are at-risk of developing cognitive impairments compared to their seronegative counterparts. Although speed of processing (SOP) training may help improve this cognitive ability, less work has examined transfer to other cognitive domains. This study examined the effect of SOP training has on secondary cognitive domains in PWH aged 40+ years. Method: In this 3-group 2-year longitudinal study, 216 PWH with HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) or borderline HAND were randomized to either: (1) 10 h of SOP training (n = 70); (2) 20 h of SOP training (n = 73); or (3) 10 h of an active control training (n = 73). Participants completed a comprehensive cognitive battery at baseline, immediately after training, and at 1 and 2 years. This battery yielded global and domain specific T-scores as well as a cognitive impairment variable. Generalized linear mixed-effect models were fitted to estimate between-group mean differences at the follow-up time-points adjusted for baseline. Results: No clinically or statistically significant improvements in any of the cognitive outcomes were observed. A sensitivity analysis was conducted; conclusions replicated those of the main analysis, with two exceptions: Global Function T and Psychomotor Speed T showed relevant training improvements among the intervention groups over the control group at the immediate post time point. Conclusions: Although SOP training has been shown to improve cognitive abilities that correspond to driving and mobility, such training has limited therapeutic utility in improving cognition in other domains in PWH with HAND.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)471-492
Number of pages22
JournalClinical Neuropsychologist
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Funding

The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The following funding is acknowledged: NIH/National Institute of Mental Health R01-award (1R01MH106366-01A1; ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT02758093; PI: Vance) titled ‘‘An RCT of Speed of Processing Training in Middle-aged and Older Adults with HIV’’; NIH/National Institute on Aging (NIA) R00-award (R00 AG048762; PI: Fazeli), ORWH and NIH/NIDA BIRCWH grant (5K12DA035150; PI: Curry with Pope); NIH/NIA P30-award (Edward R. Roybal Center for Translational Research in Aging and Mobility; P30 AG022838; PI: Ball). Karlene Ball has a commercial interest in the UFOV test used in this study.

FundersFunder number
NIDA BIRCWH5K12DA035150, P30 AG022838
National Institute of Mental Health R01-award1R01MH106366-01A1, NCT02758093
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
National Institute on AgingR00 AG048762
Office of Research on Women's Health

    Keywords

    • Brain fitness
    • HIV-Associated neurocognitive disorder
    • cognitive reserve
    • cognitive training
    • neuroplasticity
    • speed of processing

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
    • Developmental and Educational Psychology
    • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
    • Clinical Psychology
    • Psychiatry and Mental health

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A 2-year longitudinal randomized controlled trial examining the transfer of speed of processing training to secondary cognitive domains in middle-aged and older adults with HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder: Results of the think fast study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this