A comparison of tobacco product prevalence by different frequency of use thresholds across three US surveys

Luz María Sánchez-Romero, Christopher J. Cadham, Jana L. Hirschtick, Delvon T. Mattingly, Beomyoung Cho, Nancy L. Fleischer, Andrew Brouwer, Ritesh Mistry, Stephanie R. Land, Jihyoun Jeon, Rafael Meza, David T. Levy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: With the increasing changes in tobacco use patterns, “current use” definition and the survey used may have important implications for monitoring population use trends. Methods: Using three US surveys (2014/15 TUS-CPS, NHIS and PATH), we compared the adult (age 18+) prevalence of four product groups (cigarettes, other combustibles, smokeless tobacco, and e-cigarettes) based on three past 30-day frequency of use thresholds: 1+, 10+, and 25+ days. We also examined mutually exclusive single, dual, and polytobacco users as a percentage of total users for each product group. Results: Regardless of threshold or product, the prevalence was higher in PATH followed by NHIS and TUS-CPS, in some cases by large percentages. The differences in cigarette and smokeless tobacco use prevalence in going from the 1+ to 10+ days and to the 25+ days threshold were minimal. Applying different frequency thresholds had the largest impact on other combustibles prevalence, with a 60% reduction with the 10+ days threshold and a 80% reduction with the 25+ days threshold, compared to the 1+ days threshold, followed by e-cigarettes with 40 and 60% reductions, respectively. The proportion of dual and polytobacco users decreased considerably when using the 10+ vs. the 1+ days threshold and polytobacco use was almost non-existent with the 25+ days threshold. Conclusion: The estimated prevalence of each tobacco product use depends largely on the survey and frequency of use threshold adopted. The choice of survey and frequency threshold merits serious consideration when monitoring patterns of tobacco use.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1203
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).

Funding

This work was supported by funding from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) through TCORS grant U54CA229974. DL and RM also received funding from the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) of the Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, NCI under grant U01CA199284 and U01CA253858. The opinions expressed in this article are the authors’ own and do not reflect the views of the NCI, FDA, the Department of Health and Human Services, or the United States government.

FundersFunder number
Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
National Childhood Cancer Registry – National Cancer InstituteU54CA229974, U01CA253858, U01CA199284

    Keywords

    • Prevalence
    • Surveys and questionnaires
    • Tobacco products
    • United States

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of tobacco product prevalence by different frequency of use thresholds across three US surveys'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this