A defensive endosymbiont fails to protect aphids against the parasitoid community present in the field

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

1. The value of protective mutualisms provided by some facultative endosymbionts has been well demonstrated in the laboratory, yet only recently has their effectiveness in the field been studied. ‘Candidatus Hamiltonella defensa’ is known to defend aphids from parasitoid wasps in laboratory trials. However, the efficacy of this defence varies among parasitoids, suggesting that protection will vary spatially and temporally depending on parasitoid community composition. 2. This demonstrated specificity and a dearth of studies on Hamiltonella in the field prompted the authors to quantify parasitism rates of Hamiltonella-infected and -uninfected Aphis craccivora Koch aphid colonies in a manipulative field study. 3. It was found that A. craccivora in central Kentucky alfalfa were parasitised by Lysiphlebus testaceipes (Cresson) and Aphelinus sp. Surprisingly, Hamiltonella infection did not lower successful parasitism by the naturally occurring parasitoid wasps. Whether Hamiltonella was effective against L. testaceipes was subsequently tested in a controlled laboratory assay, and no effect on parasitism rate was found. 4. This study emphasises the fact that defensive symbionts sometimes provide no tangible defensive benefits under field conditions, depending on parasitoid community composition. It is hypothesised that the protective mutualism may be beneficial in geographically localised areas. When the symbiosis is effective against a local parasitoid community, aphid clones may experience eruptive population growth and rapidly disperse across a large area, allowing spread to habitats with different parasitoid communities where the mutualism is an ineffective defence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)680-684
Number of pages5
JournalEcological Entomology
Volume42
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Royal Entomological Society

Funding

We thank A. Dehnel, A. Styer, K. Jackson, T. Hansen, M. Le Gall, M. Reams, M. Rogers, B. Griffis and Y. M. Ruan for help in the field and laboratory and for providing a friendly review of this manuscript. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for helping to improve our manuscript. Special thanks to K. Hopper and J. Woolley for identification of Aphelinus. This is publication no. 17-08-038 of the Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station and is published with the approval of the Director. This work was supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under award no. 2014-67013-21576 and Hatch no. 0224651, and the University of Kentucky.

FundersFunder number
U.S. Department of Agriculture2014-67013-21576, 0224651
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
University of Kentucky
Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station

    Keywords

    • Aerial plankton
    • defensive symbiosis
    • host–parasitoid interactions
    • protective mutualism
    • symbiont

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Ecology
    • Insect Science

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A defensive endosymbiont fails to protect aphids against the parasitoid community present in the field'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this