A large-scale assessment of eastern whip-poor-will (Antrostomus vociferus) occupancy across a gradient of forest management intensity using autonomous recording units

Jeffery T. Larkin, Darin J. McNeil, Lauren Chronister, Michael E. Akresh, Emily B. Cohen, Anthony W. D'Amato, Cameron J. Fiss, Justin Kitzes, Jeffery L. Larkin, Halie A. Parker, David I. King

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Conservationists spend considerable resources to create and enhance wildlife habitat. Monitoring how species respond to these efforts helps managers allocate limited resources. However, monitoring efforts often encounter logistical challenges that are exacerbated as geographic extent increases. We used autonomous recording units (ARUs) and automated acoustic classification to mitigate the challenges of assessing Eastern Whip-poor-will (Antrostomus vociferus) response to forest management across the eastern USA. We deployed 1263 ARUs in forests with varying degrees of management intensity. Recordings were processed using an automated classifier and the resulting detection data were used to assess occupancy. Whip-poor-wills were detected at 401 survey locations. Across our study region, whip-poor-will occupancy decreased with latitude and elevation. At the landscape scale, occupancy decreased with the amount of impervious cover, increased with herbaceous cover and oak and evergreen forests, and exhibited a quadratic relationship with the amount of shrub-scrub cover. At the site-level, occupancy was negatively associated with basal area and brambles (Rubus spp.) and exhibited a quadratic relationship with woody stem density. Implementation of practices that create and sustain a mosaic of forest age classes and a diverse range of canopy closure within oak (Quercus spp.) dominated landscapes will have the highest probability of hosting whip-poor-wills. The use of ARUs and a machine learning classifier helped overcome challenges associated with monitoring a nocturnal species with a short survey window across a large spatial extent. Future monitoring efforts that combine ARU-based protocols and mappable fine-resolution structural vegetation data would likely further advance our understanding of whip-poor-will response to forest management.

Original languageEnglish
Article number121786
JournalJournal of Environmental Management
Volume366
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Ltd

Funding

This project was primarily funded by the United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resource Conservation Service ‘Conservation Effects Assessment Project’ (CEAP) grant (NR203A750023C016). Additionally, we are grateful for support from the Department of Interior Northeast Climate Adaptation Science Center, McIntyre-Stenns Capacity Grant #KY009043, Department of Biological Sciences at the University of Pittsburgh, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (0407.19.066268, 0407.19.066207, 0407.20.070428). Our funding sources did not require a review of our manuscript prior to publication, nor did they affect our data collection, results, or interpretation of analyses in any way.We would like to thank The Nature Conservancy, the many private landowners, and field technicians that made this work possible. We appreciate the many public agencies that allowed us access to their lands: Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, Pennsylvania Game Commission, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, New Jersey Fish and Wildlife, Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation, New Hampshire Fish and Game, Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, United States Forest Service, and United States Fish and Wildlife Service. We are grateful for the support of the bridges2 supercomputing cluster (psc.edu/resources/bridges-2/user-guide). Finally, we are thankful for the revisions made by the two anonymous reviewers during the publication process. This project was funded by the United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resource Conservation Service Conservation Effects Assessment Project grant NR203A750023C016, National Fish and Wildlife Foundation grants 0407.19.066268, 0407.19.066207, and 0407.20.070428, Department of Biological Sciences at the University of Pittsburgh, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation and the Department of Interior Northeast Climate Adaptation Science Center. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government or the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation and its funding sources. This project was primarily funded by the United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resource Conservation Service ‘Conservation Effects Assessment Project’ (CEAP) grant (NR203A750023C016). Additionally, we are grateful for support from the Department of Interior Northeast Climate Adaptation Science Center, Department of Biological Sciences at the University of Pittsburgh, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (0407.19.066268, 0407.19.066207, 0407.20.070428). Our funding sources did not require a review of our manuscript prior to publication, nor did they affect our data collection, results, or interpretation of analyses in any way. We would like to thank The Nature Conservancy, the many private landowners, and field technicians that made this work possible. We appreciate the many public agencies that allowed us access to their lands: Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, Pennsylvania Game Commission, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, New Jersey Fish and Wildlife, Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation, New Hampshire Fish and Game, Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, United States Forest Service, and United States Fish and Wildlife Service. We are grateful for the support of the bridges2 supercomputing cluster (psc.edu/resources/bridges-2/user-guide). Finally, we are thankful for the revisions made by the two anonymous reviewers during the publication process. This project was funded by the United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resource Conservation Service Conservation Effects Assessment Project grant NR203A750023C016, National Fish and Wildlife Foundation grants 0407.19.066268, 0407.19.066207, and 0407.20.070428, Department of Biological Sciences at the University of Pittsburgh, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation and the Department of Interior Northeast Climate Adaptation Science Center. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government or the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation and its funding sources.

FundersFunder number
United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resource Conservation Service ‘Conservation Effects Assessment Project
Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation, New Hampshire Fish and Game
Nature Conservancy
U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Forest Service
Department of Interior Northeast Climate Adaptation Science Center
Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh
Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati
Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, New Jersey Fish and Wildlife
CEAP
Massachusetts MassWildlife Division of Fisheries and Wildlife
Pennsylvania Game Commission
Department of Interior Northeast Climate Adaptation Science Center
Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resource Conservation Service ‘Conservation Effects Assessment ProjectNR203A750023C016
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation0407.19.066207, 0407.19.066268, 0407.20.070428

    Keywords

    • Forest management
    • Machine learning classifier
    • Nightjar
    • Oak
    • Passive acoustic monitoring
    • Private lands conservation

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Environmental Engineering
    • Waste Management and Disposal
    • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A large-scale assessment of eastern whip-poor-will (Antrostomus vociferus) occupancy across a gradient of forest management intensity using autonomous recording units'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this