TY - JOUR
T1 - A lateral cephalometric analysis of nasal morphology following Le Fort I osteotomy applying photometric analysis techniques
AU - Gassmann, Carl J.
AU - Nishioka, Gary J.
AU - Van Sickels, Joseph E.
AU - Thrash, William J.
PY - 1989/9
Y1 - 1989/9
N2 - Fifty patients who had undergone Le Fort I maxillary osteotomies were studied. Cephalograms were available preoperatively and at least 6 months postoperatively. Soft-tissue analysis of the nasal profile was done employing three angles commonly used in the photometric analysis performed for rhinoplasty: nasal tip projection angle, columellar angle, and supratip break angle. Maxillary movement was assessed in two ways: 1) horizontal and vertical component vectors of A-point movement were calculated, and 2) maxillary rotation, defined as the change in the angle of a line drawn from the anterior nasal spine to the posterior nasal spine relative to the anterior cranial base, was calculated. The component vectors of A-point movement and maxillary rotation were then used as predictor variables for change in the soft-tissue angles in a multiple-regression analysis. A weak correlation was found between A-point movement in both the horizontal and vertical dimensions and the nasal tip projection angle. When A-point was moved in an anterior and superior direction, the nasal tip rotated up. The converse was true with movement in the posterior and inferior direction. Only A-point movement in the horizontal dimension had a significant relationship with columellar angle. When A-point was moved in an anterior direction, columellar angle increased. This study shows that prediction of the soft-tissue profile of the nose following maxillary surgery is difficult.
AB - Fifty patients who had undergone Le Fort I maxillary osteotomies were studied. Cephalograms were available preoperatively and at least 6 months postoperatively. Soft-tissue analysis of the nasal profile was done employing three angles commonly used in the photometric analysis performed for rhinoplasty: nasal tip projection angle, columellar angle, and supratip break angle. Maxillary movement was assessed in two ways: 1) horizontal and vertical component vectors of A-point movement were calculated, and 2) maxillary rotation, defined as the change in the angle of a line drawn from the anterior nasal spine to the posterior nasal spine relative to the anterior cranial base, was calculated. The component vectors of A-point movement and maxillary rotation were then used as predictor variables for change in the soft-tissue angles in a multiple-regression analysis. A weak correlation was found between A-point movement in both the horizontal and vertical dimensions and the nasal tip projection angle. When A-point was moved in an anterior and superior direction, the nasal tip rotated up. The converse was true with movement in the posterior and inferior direction. Only A-point movement in the horizontal dimension had a significant relationship with columellar angle. When A-point was moved in an anterior direction, columellar angle increased. This study shows that prediction of the soft-tissue profile of the nose following maxillary surgery is difficult.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024441392&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024441392&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0278-2391(89)90375-3
DO - 10.1016/0278-2391(89)90375-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 2760729
AN - SCOPUS:0024441392
SN - 0278-2391
VL - 47
SP - 926
EP - 930
JO - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
JF - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
IS - 9
ER -