TY - JOUR
T1 - A Meta-Analysis on Behavioral Support Training and General Education Teacher Implementation
AU - Samudre, Mark D.
AU - LeJeune, Lauren M.
AU - Anderson, Eric J.
AU - Viotto, Jacqueline A.
AU - Brock, Matthew E.
AU - Nichols, Hannah
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.
PY - 2024/1
Y1 - 2024/1
N2 - The success of teachers is tied to their effectiveness in managing student behavior. In this meta-analysis, we identified 49 single-case-design studies that evaluated the effectiveness of teacher training on their implementation of behavioral support strategies. Training was most often provided in a one-on-one format (n = 18) and included ongoing coaching (n = 20). Thirty-three of the 49 designs met What Works Clearinghouse standards with or without reservations. The overall between-case standardized mean difference effect size was d = 1.50. We analyzed and grouped teacher- and student-level outcomes as a result of training into five domains: (a) teacher-delivered praise (d = 1.94), (b) teacher desirable behavior (e.g., treatment fidelity; d = 1.22), (c) teacher undesirable behavior (e.g., reprimands; d = 0.87), (d) student desirable behavior (d = 1.88), and (e) student undesirable behavior (d = 1.22). Across all studies, the combined nonoverlap of all pairs scores ranged from 0.37 to 1.0 (M = 0.866). We discuss future areas of research as well as implications for teacher training in behavioral support implementation.
AB - The success of teachers is tied to their effectiveness in managing student behavior. In this meta-analysis, we identified 49 single-case-design studies that evaluated the effectiveness of teacher training on their implementation of behavioral support strategies. Training was most often provided in a one-on-one format (n = 18) and included ongoing coaching (n = 20). Thirty-three of the 49 designs met What Works Clearinghouse standards with or without reservations. The overall between-case standardized mean difference effect size was d = 1.50. We analyzed and grouped teacher- and student-level outcomes as a result of training into five domains: (a) teacher-delivered praise (d = 1.94), (b) teacher desirable behavior (e.g., treatment fidelity; d = 1.22), (c) teacher undesirable behavior (e.g., reprimands; d = 0.87), (d) student desirable behavior (d = 1.88), and (e) student undesirable behavior (d = 1.22). Across all studies, the combined nonoverlap of all pairs scores ranged from 0.37 to 1.0 (M = 0.866). We discuss future areas of research as well as implications for teacher training in behavioral support implementation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85159724310&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85159724310&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/00144029231172175
DO - 10.1177/00144029231172175
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85159724310
SN - 0014-4029
VL - 90
SP - 164
EP - 185
JO - Exceptional Children
JF - Exceptional Children
IS - 2
ER -