TY - JOUR
T1 - A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders
T2 - A facet level analysis
AU - Samuel, Douglas B.
AU - Widiger, Thomas A.
PY - 2008/12
Y1 - 2008/12
N2 - Theory and research have suggested that the personality disorders contained within the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) can be understood as maladaptive variants of the personality traits included within the five-factor model (FFM). The current meta-analysis of FFM personality disorder research both replicated and extended the 2004 work of Saulsman and Page (The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1055-1085) through a facet level analysis that provides a more specific and nuanced description of each DSM-IV-TR personality disorder. The empirical FFM profiles generated for each personality disorder were generally congruent at the facet level with hypothesized FFM translations of the DSM-IV-TR personality disorders. However, notable exceptions to the hypotheses did occur and even some findings that were consistent with FFM theory could be said to be instrument specific.
AB - Theory and research have suggested that the personality disorders contained within the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) can be understood as maladaptive variants of the personality traits included within the five-factor model (FFM). The current meta-analysis of FFM personality disorder research both replicated and extended the 2004 work of Saulsman and Page (The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1055-1085) through a facet level analysis that provides a more specific and nuanced description of each DSM-IV-TR personality disorder. The empirical FFM profiles generated for each personality disorder were generally congruent at the facet level with hypothesized FFM translations of the DSM-IV-TR personality disorders. However, notable exceptions to the hypotheses did occur and even some findings that were consistent with FFM theory could be said to be instrument specific.
KW - DSM
KW - Dimensional
KW - FFM
KW - MCMI
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Personality disorder
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=55649084136&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=55649084136&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.07.002
DO - 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.07.002
M3 - Review article
C2 - 18708274
AN - SCOPUS:55649084136
SN - 0272-7358
VL - 28
SP - 1326
EP - 1342
JO - Clinical Psychology Review
JF - Clinical Psychology Review
IS - 8
ER -