A multifunctional approach for achieving simultaneous biodiversity conservation and farmer livelihood in coffee agroecosystems

Aaron L. Iverson, David J. Gonthier, D. Pak, Katherine K. Ennis, Robyn J. Burnham, Ivette Perfecto, Mariangie Ramos Rodriguez, John H. Vandermeer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

Ecologically complex agroecosystems often provide multiple conservation benefits, yet understanding the agricultural practices that favor biodiversity is often a theoretical task until we simultaneously demonstrate the economic impact of such practices on farmers. We provide a multifunctional analysis of both biodiversity and ecosystem services that influence coffee farm profit in Puerto Rico. We show that the vegetation heterogeneity of an agroecosystem, more so than any one ecological component (e.g. shade), is associated with a higher biodiversity of plants, birds, lizards, bees, ants, and parasitoid wasps. However, a farm's vegetation heterogeneity does not consistently correlate with profit-related ecosystem services, including coffee yield and biological control of coffee pests and pathogens, due to tradeoffs between services. Therefore, inherent financial incentives that would encourage farmers to manage farms in ways that maintain high associated biodiversity may be lacking. We explored several economic incentives that would allow farms to be simultaneously biodiverse and profitable, which we show is possible through realistic incentive schemes. We found that the combination of a certification premium plus carbon payments (50% premium plus $16 t 1 CO2e) or a restructuring of agricultural subsidies using currently experienced subsidy amounts may be sufficient to make farms that are more heterogeneous, and therefore more biodiverse, the most profitable option for farmers. If these biodiverse farms can also be profitable, it will open critical opportunities for maintaining rural landscapes that support farmers' livelihoods, as well as protect the planet's biodiversity.

Original languageEnglish
Article number108179
JournalBiological Conservation
Volume238
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd

Funding

We thank the coffee farmers who participated in this study: the Morales family, J. & A. Rivera, H. & E. Quiles, D. Belis, E. Biamón, C. Pacheco, A. Pérez, A. Acosta, A. Padilla, A. Irizarry, A. Rivera, J. Ostolaza, E. & E. Biruet, F. Rivera, F. Boneta, G. Mata, H. Arbelo, H. Rivera, J. Ralat, K. Rivera, L. González, M. Santiago, M. López, P. Jiménez, R. Torre, R. Toledo, R. Atiensa, S. Matos, T. La Luz, V. Ríos, V. Matos, V. Torres, and W. Irizarry. We thank O. Ramos Rodríguez, M. Dávila Negrón, J. Irizarry, and F. Gallardo for facilitating our research. We thank staff at the Puerto Rico Department of Agriculture-Utuado, specifically S. Reyes and N. López, for assistance in contacting coffee farmers. We thank I. Ibañez for comments on the manuscript and B. Cardinale for advice on the analysis. We thank those who assisted us in the field and lab: D. Andree, K. Li, L. Iverson, M. Iverson, and especially E. Iverson, M. Alejandro, A. Rivera, and J. Oliveras Rovira. We thank F. Axelrod for assistance in plant identification. We thank several anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments. This work was supported by the University of Michigan Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and the University of Michigan Rackham Graduate School.

FundersFunder number
Puerto Rico Department of Agriculture-Utuado
University Of Michigan Department Of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies, University of Michigan

    Keywords

    • Agricultural management intensity
    • Biological control
    • Ecosystem services
    • Farm profit
    • Landscape composition
    • Tradeoffs and synergies

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
    • Nature and Landscape Conservation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A multifunctional approach for achieving simultaneous biodiversity conservation and farmer livelihood in coffee agroecosystems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this