A new look at the high frequency boundary element and Rayleigh integral approximations

D. W. Herrin; F. Martinus; T. W. Wu; A. F. Seybert

doi:10.4271/2003-01-1451

A new look at the high frequency boundary element and Rayleigh integral approximations

D. W. Herrin, F. Martinus, T. W. Wu, A. F. Seybert

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

Research output: Contribution to journal › Conference article › peer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper revisits the popular Rayleigh integral approximation, and also considers a second approximation, the high frequency boundary element method which is similar to the Rayleigh integral. Both methods are approximations to the boundary integral equation, and can solve problems in a fraction of the time required by the conventional boundary element method. The development of both methods from the Helmholtz integral equation is demonstrated and the differences between the two methods are delineated. Both methods were compared on practical examples including a running engine, gearbox, and construction cab. It was concluded that both methods can reliably predict the sound power for many problems but are inaccurate for sound pressure computations.

Original language	English
Journal	SAE Technical Papers
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-1451
State	Published - 2003
Event	Noise and Vibration Conference and Exhibition - Traverse City, MI, United States Duration: May 5 2003 → May 8 2003

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Automotive Engineering
Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Pollution
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Access to Document

10.4271/2003-01-1451

Cite this

@article{2f9fe0dde60143d6aac3ebdf493efdc5,

title = "A new look at the high frequency boundary element and Rayleigh integral approximations",

abstract = "This paper revisits the popular Rayleigh integral approximation, and also considers a second approximation, the high frequency boundary element method which is similar to the Rayleigh integral. Both methods are approximations to the boundary integral equation, and can solve problems in a fraction of the time required by the conventional boundary element method. The development of both methods from the Helmholtz integral equation is demonstrated and the differences between the two methods are delineated. Both methods were compared on practical examples including a running engine, gearbox, and construction cab. It was concluded that both methods can reliably predict the sound power for many problems but are inaccurate for sound pressure computations.",

author = "Herrin, {D. W.} and F. Martinus and Wu, {T. W.} and Seybert, {A. F.}",

year = "2003",

doi = "10.4271/2003-01-1451",

language = "English",

note = "Noise and Vibration Conference and Exhibition ; Conference date: 05-05-2003 Through 08-05-2003",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new look at the high frequency boundary element and Rayleigh integral approximations

AU - Herrin, D. W.

AU - Martinus, F.

AU - Wu, T. W.

AU - Seybert, A. F.

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - This paper revisits the popular Rayleigh integral approximation, and also considers a second approximation, the high frequency boundary element method which is similar to the Rayleigh integral. Both methods are approximations to the boundary integral equation, and can solve problems in a fraction of the time required by the conventional boundary element method. The development of both methods from the Helmholtz integral equation is demonstrated and the differences between the two methods are delineated. Both methods were compared on practical examples including a running engine, gearbox, and construction cab. It was concluded that both methods can reliably predict the sound power for many problems but are inaccurate for sound pressure computations.

AB - This paper revisits the popular Rayleigh integral approximation, and also considers a second approximation, the high frequency boundary element method which is similar to the Rayleigh integral. Both methods are approximations to the boundary integral equation, and can solve problems in a fraction of the time required by the conventional boundary element method. The development of both methods from the Helmholtz integral equation is demonstrated and the differences between the two methods are delineated. Both methods were compared on practical examples including a running engine, gearbox, and construction cab. It was concluded that both methods can reliably predict the sound power for many problems but are inaccurate for sound pressure computations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072435058&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072435058&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4271/2003-01-1451

DO - 10.4271/2003-01-1451

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:85072435058

SN - 0148-7191

JO - SAE Technical Papers

JF - SAE Technical Papers

T2 - Noise and Vibration Conference and Exhibition

Y2 - 5 May 2003 through 8 May 2003

ER -

A new look at the high frequency boundary element and Rayleigh integral approximations

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this