A phase II evaluation of elesclomol sodium and weekly paclitaxel in the treatment of recurrent or persistent platinum-resistant ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer: An NRG oncology/gynecologic oncology group study

Bradley J. Monk, James T. Kauderer, Katherine M. Moxley, Albert J. Bonebrake, Summer B. Dewdney, Angeles Alvarez Secord, Frederick R. Ueland, Carolyn M. Johnston, Carol Aghajanian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

51 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: Preclinical data suggest elesclomol increases oxidative stress and enhances sensitivity to cytotoxic agents. The objective of this prospective multicenter phase 2 trial was to estimate the activity of IV elesclomol plus weekly paclitaxel in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian, tubal or peritoneal cancer through the frequency of objective tumor responses (ORR). Methods: Patients with measurable disease, acceptable organ function, performance status ≤ 2, and one prior platinum containing regimen were eligible. A two-stage design was utilized with a target sample size of 22 and 30 subjects, respectively. Prior Gynecologic Oncology Group studies within the same population involving single agent taxanes showed an ORR of approximately (20%) and served as a historical control for direct comparison. The present study was designed to determine if the regimen had an ORR of ≥40% with 90% power. Results: Fifty-eight patients were enrolled, of whom 2 received no study treatment and were inevaluable. The median number of cycles was 3 (268 total cycles, range 1–18). The number of patients responding was 11 (19.6%; 90% CI 11.4% to 30.4%) with one complete response. The median progression-free survival and overall survival was 3.6 months and 13.3 months, respectively. The median ORR duration was 9.2 months. Percentages of subjects with grade 3 toxicity included: Neutropenia 9%; anemia 5%; metabolic 5%; nausea 4%; infection 4%; neurologic (mostly neuropathy) 4%; and vascular (mostly thromboembolism) 4%. There were no grade 4 toxicities reported. Conclusions: This combination was well tolerated but is unworthy of further investigation based on the proportion responding [ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00888615].

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)422-427
Number of pages6
JournalGynecologic Oncology
Volume151
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018

Funding

This study was supported by National Cancer Institute grants to the Gynecologic Oncology Group Administrative Office ( CA 27469 ), the Gynecologic Oncology Group Statistical and Data Center ( CA 37517 ), NRG Oncology ( 1 U10 CA180822 ) and NRG Operations ( U10CA180868 ). The following NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group member institutions participated in this study: University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Cancer Research for the Ozarks NCORP, Rush University Medical Center, Duke University Medical Center, University of Kentucky, Michigan Cancer Research Consortium Community Clinical Oncology Program, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Washington University School of Medicine, MD Ander Cancer Center, University of Virginia, The Hospital of Central Connecticut, Iowa-Wide Oncology Research Coalition NCORP, Abington Memorial Hospital, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Indiana University Hospital/Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, University of California Medical Center at Irvine-Orange Campus, Cooper Hospital University Medical Center, Yale University, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Women and Infants Hospital, Saint Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Piedmont Hospital, Central Illinois CCOP, Virginia Commonwealth University, Mainline Health CCOP, Wichita CCOP, Southeast Cancer Control Consortium CCOP and Northside Hospital. This study was supported by National Cancer Institute grants to the Gynecologic Oncology Group Administrative Office (CA 27469), the Gynecologic Oncology Group Statistical and Data Center (CA 37517), NRG Oncology (1 U10 CA180822) and NRG Operations (U10CA180868). The following NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group member institutions participated in this study: University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Cancer Research for the Ozarks NCORP, Rush University Medical Center, Duke University Medical Center, University of Kentucky, Michigan Cancer Research Consortium Community Clinical Oncology Program, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Washington University School of Medicine, MD Ander Cancer Center, University of Virginia, The Hospital of Central Connecticut, Iowa-Wide Oncology Research Coalition NCORP, Abington Memorial Hospital, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Indiana University Hospital/Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, University of California Medical Center at Irvine-Orange Campus, Cooper Hospital University Medical Center, Yale University, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Women and Infants Hospital, Saint Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Piedmont Hospital, Central Illinois CCOP, Virginia Commonwealth University, Mainline Health CCOP, Wichita CCOP, Southeast Cancer Control Consortium CCOP and Northside Hospital.

FundersFunder number
Abington Memorial Hospital
Yorkshire Cancer Research/Cancer Research UK Sheffield Cancer Centre
Hospital of Central Connecticut
Indiana University Hospital/Melvin
Iowa-Wide Oncology Research Coalition NCORP
NRG Oncology1 U10 CA180822
Northside Hospital
Rush University Medical Center
Saint Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center
Southeast Cancer Control Consortium CCOP
University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Women and Infants Hospital
National Childhood Cancer Registry – National Cancer InstituteCA 37517, CA 27469, U10CA180868, UG1CA189867
National Childhood Cancer Registry – National Cancer Institute
Yale University
Emory University School of Medicine
University Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Virginia Commonwealth University

    Keywords

    • Clinical trial
    • Elesclomol
    • Ovarian cancer

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Oncology
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A phase II evaluation of elesclomol sodium and weekly paclitaxel in the treatment of recurrent or persistent platinum-resistant ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer: An NRG oncology/gynecologic oncology group study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this