A preventive intervention to modify depression risk targets after breast cancer diagnosis: Design and single-arm pilot study

Karen L. Weihs, Mairead H. McConnell, Joshua F. Wiley, Catherine M. Crespi, Shannon Sauer-Zavala, Annette L. Stanton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: Apply the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Stage Model to design and test an intervention to prevent depression in breast cancer patients at risk for depression. Methods: We identified mindful emotion awareness, along with approach and avoidance strategies for cancer-related coping and emotion regulation, as targets for a preventive intervention adapted from the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders. Patients' preferences for individual, in-person, and time-efficient sessions informed the design. Patients at risk for depression received a 6-week, 5-hour intervention with daily exercises. Intervention targets were assessed at baseline, before each session, and 4-weeks post intervention. Mixed effects analysis of variance (ANOVA) assessed change over the follow-up period, controlling for age, partnered status, and disease stage. Results: Fifty-five percent (40/72) of women screened within 6 months of diagnosis had elevated depression risk. Of these, 24 (60%) signed consent. Sixteen received intervention after five were excluded for current depressive disorder, cognitive impairment, or death. Three dropped out. Ninety-eight percent attendance and 77% practice days indicated feasibility. Effect sizes (Cohen's d) corrected for regression to the mean (RTM) were 0.82 for cancer-related acceptance coping, 0.65 for cancer-related emotional expression, and 0.32 and 0.42 for decreased cancer-related avoidance coping and depressive symptoms, respectively. Effect sizes for variables lacking data to correct for RTM were 1.0, 0.7, and 0.5 for decreased rumination, experiential avoidance, and fear of depression, respectively, and 1.3, 0.6, and 0.4 for increased cognitive flexibility, distress tolerance, and describing/not judging emotions, respectively. Conclusions: The feasibility of this intervention and malleability of its targets support its further investigation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)880-887
Number of pages8
JournalPsycho-Oncology
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Funding

Breast Cancer Research Fund, Grant/Award Number: 20184915; National Cancer Institute, Grant/Award Numbers: NIH R01 CA133081, NCI‐NIH P30 CA 16042 and NCI‐NIH P30CA023074 Supported by NIH R01 CA133081 (Stanton & Weihs, co‐PIs); Breast Cancer Research Foundation BCRF‐18‐153 (Stanton, PI); NCI‐NIH P30CA023074 (Alberts, PI); NCI‐NIH P30 CA 16042 (Crespi, PI: Teitel).

FundersFunder number
Breast Cancer Research Foundation BCRF‐18‐153
KY Breast Cancer Trust and Research Fund20184915
National Childhood Cancer Registry – National Cancer InstituteP30CA016042, P30CA023074, R01 CA133081
National Childhood Cancer Registry – National Cancer Institute
Carol M. Baldwin Breast Cancer Research Fund

    Keywords

    • breast cancer
    • coping
    • depression
    • intervention
    • oncology
    • prevention

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
    • Oncology
    • Psychiatry and Mental health

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A preventive intervention to modify depression risk targets after breast cancer diagnosis: Design and single-arm pilot study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this