Abstract
The purpose of this study was to conduct a validation analysis of an SET and provide a validation framework of SETs that can be included when designing complete evaluations of teaching within higher education institutions. A series of Rasch analyses was conducted on the results of the SET, examining the responses of students within a college and three departments. Results show the majority of items were moderately difficult to endorse in the college and departments, there were issues with DIF, and two items did not consistently fit the model. The study provides an analysis framework that may aid policymakers and institutional administrators in developing higher quality SETs, and demonstrates the need for validating SETs being implemented in higher education settings.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 77-87 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Studies in Educational Evaluation |
Volume | 51 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 1 2016 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2016 Elsevier Ltd
Keywords
- Course evaluation
- Evaluation methods
- Higher education
- Rasch
- Teacher evaluation
- Validation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Education