A Qualitative Analysis of Student Experiences of Opportunities and Actions for Bystander Intervention Across Various Levels of Threat

Annelise Mennicke, Jessamyn Moxie, Erika Montanaro, Jasmine Temple, Madi Williams, Hannah Carlson, Gabrielle Haley, Bridget N. Jules, Erin A. Meehan, Michael Brienzo, Casey Mesaeh, Anna Yoder, Victoria McClare, Heather M. Bush, Ann L. Coker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Bystander interventions (BI) are a promising and increasingly employed social approach to public health problems in college settings. One missed opportunity to enhance the efficacy of many BI programs is a need for input from the intervention target, such as students. We seek to address this research gap by using college students’ experiences to identify additional attributes of bystander opportunities and actions. Methods: This study utilized data collected between 2017 and 2019 from students in 11 large colleges participating in the Multi-college Bystander Efficacy Evaluation. Students were asked to report behaviors they used after witnessing five concerning situations with the option to write in behaviors not represented in response options. Additionally, students were asked to indicate if they witnessed any other concerning situations and, if so, to describe the situation. Data from 5,154 students that responded to the open-ended prompts were analyzed using a content analysis approach to identify additional opportunities and actions. Results: Respondents were predominantly White (68%), heterosexual (79%), and cisgender women (70%). Open-ended responses suggested four domains for BI opportunity in college settings: interpersonal violence, stranger violence, substance-related situations, and bias-related situations. We identified four threat assessment levels related to opportunities: apprehension, specific risk, active harm, and institutional issues; and three categories of actions: help-seeking, intervening on one’s own, and preventing. Conclusions: Our multi-college assessment identified additional bystander-related opportunities and actions grounded in student experiences. Recommendations are offered to improve the design and evaluation of BI programs.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Family Violence
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Funding

The parent study was supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Cooperative Agreement 5U01CE001675. Support for the secondary data analysis research was provided by the National Institutes of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (1R15AA028910-01).

FundersFunder number
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention5U01CE001675

    Keywords

    • Bystander action
    • Bystander intervention
    • Bystander opportunity
    • College

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Clinical Psychology
    • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Law

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A Qualitative Analysis of Student Experiences of Opportunities and Actions for Bystander Intervention Across Various Levels of Threat'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this