TY - JOUR
T1 - A Qualitative Analysis of Student Experiences of Opportunities and Actions for Bystander Intervention Across Various Levels of Threat
AU - Mennicke, Annelise
AU - Moxie, Jessamyn
AU - Montanaro, Erika
AU - Temple, Jasmine
AU - Williams, Madi
AU - Carlson, Hannah
AU - Haley, Gabrielle
AU - Jules, Bridget N.
AU - Meehan, Erin A.
AU - Brienzo, Michael
AU - Mesaeh, Casey
AU - Yoder, Anna
AU - McClare, Victoria
AU - Bush, Heather M.
AU - Coker, Ann L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Purpose: Bystander interventions (BI) are a promising and increasingly employed social approach to public health problems in college settings. One missed opportunity to enhance the efficacy of many BI programs is a need for input from the intervention target, such as students. We seek to address this research gap by using college students’ experiences to identify additional attributes of bystander opportunities and actions. Methods: This study utilized data collected between 2017 and 2019 from students in 11 large colleges participating in the Multi-college Bystander Efficacy Evaluation. Students were asked to report behaviors they used after witnessing five concerning situations with the option to write in behaviors not represented in response options. Additionally, students were asked to indicate if they witnessed any other concerning situations and, if so, to describe the situation. Data from 5,154 students that responded to the open-ended prompts were analyzed using a content analysis approach to identify additional opportunities and actions. Results: Respondents were predominantly White (68%), heterosexual (79%), and cisgender women (70%). Open-ended responses suggested four domains for BI opportunity in college settings: interpersonal violence, stranger violence, substance-related situations, and bias-related situations. We identified four threat assessment levels related to opportunities: apprehension, specific risk, active harm, and institutional issues; and three categories of actions: help-seeking, intervening on one’s own, and preventing. Conclusions: Our multi-college assessment identified additional bystander-related opportunities and actions grounded in student experiences. Recommendations are offered to improve the design and evaluation of BI programs.
AB - Purpose: Bystander interventions (BI) are a promising and increasingly employed social approach to public health problems in college settings. One missed opportunity to enhance the efficacy of many BI programs is a need for input from the intervention target, such as students. We seek to address this research gap by using college students’ experiences to identify additional attributes of bystander opportunities and actions. Methods: This study utilized data collected between 2017 and 2019 from students in 11 large colleges participating in the Multi-college Bystander Efficacy Evaluation. Students were asked to report behaviors they used after witnessing five concerning situations with the option to write in behaviors not represented in response options. Additionally, students were asked to indicate if they witnessed any other concerning situations and, if so, to describe the situation. Data from 5,154 students that responded to the open-ended prompts were analyzed using a content analysis approach to identify additional opportunities and actions. Results: Respondents were predominantly White (68%), heterosexual (79%), and cisgender women (70%). Open-ended responses suggested four domains for BI opportunity in college settings: interpersonal violence, stranger violence, substance-related situations, and bias-related situations. We identified four threat assessment levels related to opportunities: apprehension, specific risk, active harm, and institutional issues; and three categories of actions: help-seeking, intervening on one’s own, and preventing. Conclusions: Our multi-college assessment identified additional bystander-related opportunities and actions grounded in student experiences. Recommendations are offered to improve the design and evaluation of BI programs.
KW - Bystander action
KW - Bystander intervention
KW - Bystander opportunity
KW - College
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85170365330&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85170365330&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10896-023-00633-4
DO - 10.1007/s10896-023-00633-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85170365330
SN - 0885-7482
JO - Journal of Family Violence
JF - Journal of Family Violence
ER -