TY - JOUR
T1 - A response to Harris, Gould, and Fujiura
T2 - Beyond scoping reviews: A case for mixed-methods research reviews
AU - Fitzgerald, Shawn M.
AU - Rumrill, Phillip D.
AU - Merchant, William R.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - This article serves as a response to the Work article on scoping literature reviews by Harris et al. [1]. Conceptualizing scoping reviews as an exploratory approach to organizing literature and research findings in a content area that is still developing, we propose a mixed-methods approach to systematic reviews that enables researchers to capture the breadth and depth of existing knowledge, thereby facilitating the transfer of research findings into field practice.
AB - This article serves as a response to the Work article on scoping literature reviews by Harris et al. [1]. Conceptualizing scoping reviews as an exploratory approach to organizing literature and research findings in a content area that is still developing, we propose a mixed-methods approach to systematic reviews that enables researchers to capture the breadth and depth of existing knowledge, thereby facilitating the transfer of research findings into field practice.
KW - mixed-methods reviews
KW - Reviews
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016650025&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016650025&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3233/WOR-141983
DO - 10.3233/WOR-141983
M3 - Review article
C2 - 25503884
AN - SCOPUS:85016650025
SN - 1051-9815
VL - 50
SP - 335
EP - 339
JO - Work
JF - Work
IS - 2
ER -
