A Review of Quality Improvement Process Measures for Colorectal Surgery in the United States Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database - Have We Made Progress?

Erin E. McAtee, Asif M. Talukder, Daniel L. Davenport, Avinash S. Bhakta, Jitesh A. Patel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Numerous guidelines have been published regarding Enhanced Recovery Programs (ERP) following colorectal surgery over the past decade. Participation in these guidelines at a national level is unclear. We hypothesize that the adaptation of ERP for patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery is limited but the use of quality improvement measures has increased and while outcomes have improved over the past several years. A total of 86 402 patients were evaluated undergoing elective colectomy between 2013-2018 using the ACS-NSQIP database. Over a 5-year period, there was a significant increase in the use of quality improvement process measures: mechanical and oral bowel preparation and minimally invasive approach. During this time, there was a significant decrease in overall perioperative morbidities (P <.001). These encouraging results from a large national database suggest that evidence-based, quality improvement guidelines are being embraced and that overall outcomes for patients undergoing elective colectomy are improving.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2976-2978
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Surgeon
Volume89
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.

Keywords

  • Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)
  • colorectal
  • minimally invasive surgery
  • surgical quality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Review of Quality Improvement Process Measures for Colorectal Surgery in the United States Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database - Have We Made Progress?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this