Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A rodent model using skeletal anchorage and low forces for orthodontic tooth movement

  • Sudha Gudhimella
  • , Abdelhamed Y. Ibrahim
  • , Divakar Karanth
  • , Alex M. Kluemper
  • , Philip M. Westgate
  • , David A. Puleo
  • , Sarandeep S. Huja

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: Nonhuman animal models have been used extensively to study orthodontic tooth movement (OTM). However, rodent models have disadvantages, including a reported reduction in bone volume during OTM. The purpose of this study was to determine the viability of a skeletal anchorage and the effect of low force (∼3 cN) on interradicular bone volume during OTM. Methods: Ninety Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into 5 time points. A miniscrew and a nickel titanium coil spring placed a load of 3 cN (experimental) or 0 cN (sham) on the maxillary first molar in a split-mouth design. Displacement of the first molar and bone volume/total volume (BV/TV) in the interradicular region were quantified. Results: The success rate of the miniscrew was 98.9% (89 out of 90). Linear and angular tooth movement increased steadily (mean 0.1 mm/wk, 0.48 mm at 40 days). BV/TV was significantly reduced between the tooth movement and non–tooth movement sides in the 3 cN group: by 13%, 23%, 15%, 23%, and 16% at 3, 7, 14, 28, and 40 days, respectively. Conclusions: Our model resulted in efficient OTM without skeletal anchorage failure. BV/TV reduction was lower than in previous reports. This novel validated model is likely to be the basis for future studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)254-263
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Volume155
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American Association of Orthodontists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthodontics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A rodent model using skeletal anchorage and low forces for orthodontic tooth movement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this