TY - JOUR
T1 - A strength study utilizing the electro-stim 180
AU - Boutelle, D.
AU - Smith, B.
AU - Malone, T.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1985
Y1 - 1985
N2 - Increased interest has developed in the use of electrical stimulation as either an adjunct or a substitution for voluntary muscle contraction as a technique to improve strength in normal individuals. This study was conducted in an attempt to determine if electrical stimulation does significantly increase the strength of normal musculature. A sample using 17 normal subjects (10 male, 7 female) with an average mean age of 26 years was obtained. In this study the subjects were divided into two groups. Three different speeds (0, 60, and 240°/sec) with 3-5 contractions at each speed were used to determine the maximum strength of each subject's nondominant leg as measured by a Cybex® II dynamometer. Group A consisted of 8 subjects (3 male, 5 female) who served as a control group. Group B consisted of 9 subjects (7 male, 2 female) who received electrical stimulation to the nondominant leg for 20 treatment sessions (5 days/week for 4 weeks). Results indicate that group B did have a significant strength gain which was achieved after 4 weeks of stimulation. These results were only significant at an isometric mode (0°/sec) and did not carry over to dynamic measurement.
AB - Increased interest has developed in the use of electrical stimulation as either an adjunct or a substitution for voluntary muscle contraction as a technique to improve strength in normal individuals. This study was conducted in an attempt to determine if electrical stimulation does significantly increase the strength of normal musculature. A sample using 17 normal subjects (10 male, 7 female) with an average mean age of 26 years was obtained. In this study the subjects were divided into two groups. Three different speeds (0, 60, and 240°/sec) with 3-5 contractions at each speed were used to determine the maximum strength of each subject's nondominant leg as measured by a Cybex® II dynamometer. Group A consisted of 8 subjects (3 male, 5 female) who served as a control group. Group B consisted of 9 subjects (7 male, 2 female) who received electrical stimulation to the nondominant leg for 20 treatment sessions (5 days/week for 4 weeks). Results indicate that group B did have a significant strength gain which was achieved after 4 weeks of stimulation. These results were only significant at an isometric mode (0°/sec) and did not carry over to dynamic measurement.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022236853&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022236853&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2519/jospt.1985.7.2.50
DO - 10.2519/jospt.1985.7.2.50
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0022236853
SN - 0190-6011
VL - 7
SP - 50
EP - 53
JO - Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
JF - Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
IS - 2
ER -