Abstract
The medical literature on Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) was reviewed both to establish the quantity of scientific communications regarding this condition and to determine the quality of the research methods. Compared to other conditions, substantially more communications on AIDS occurred during the period under review. Compared to two other serious medical conditions, the AIDS literature contained an overrepresentation of letters-to-the-editor and an underrepresentation of editorials and commentaries. The major methodological shortcoming of the research literature was the failure to use appropriate sampling frames.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 73-77 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Evaluation and Program Planning |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1990 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This research was supported by contract 87M019835601D from the National Institute of Mental Health. The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily represent the views of NIMH.
Funding
This research was supported by contract 87M019835601D from the National Institute of Mental Health. The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily represent the views of NIMH.
| Funders |
|---|
| National Institute of Mental Health |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Business and International Management
- Social Psychology
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Strategy and Management
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A systematic analysis of the quantity of AIDS publications and the quality of research methods in three general medical journals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver