TY - JOUR
T1 - A systematic review of e-health interventions for physical activity
T2 - An analysis of study design, intervention characteristics, and outcomes
AU - LaPlante, Carolyn
AU - Peng, Wei
PY - 2011/9/1
Y1 - 2011/9/1
N2 - Objective: This systematic literature review of e-health interventions targeting physical activity (PA) from January 2006 to November 2010 provides an updated and critical picture of the state of e-health as a facilitator for PA interventions. Materials and Methods: A systematic search yielded 31 articles that fit into the inclusion/exclusion criteria, which were analyzed in terms of study design quality, intervention characteristics, and support for e-health in PA interventions. Results: The included articles met most of the study design criteria, but many did not isolate e-health technologies or use power analyses to calculate sample sizes. The interventions reflected a variety of technologies, audiences, and methods, and showed consistent use of theoretical frameworks to guide the interventions. Results regarding support for e-health's effectiveness in PA interventions were mixed and cannot provide definite conclusions. Only seven studies used pure control groups, and of those, four demonstrated support for e-health but the others showed no significant differences. The majority of studies using comparison groups showed no significant differences between conditions. No notable patterns emerged among the studies that did show support for e-health. Conclusions: Future research should utilize more rigorous methods that allow for better comparison across studies, such as power analyses, pure control groups, and objective PA measurements, which could lead to more definitive results regarding e-health's effectiveness for PA interventions.
AB - Objective: This systematic literature review of e-health interventions targeting physical activity (PA) from January 2006 to November 2010 provides an updated and critical picture of the state of e-health as a facilitator for PA interventions. Materials and Methods: A systematic search yielded 31 articles that fit into the inclusion/exclusion criteria, which were analyzed in terms of study design quality, intervention characteristics, and support for e-health in PA interventions. Results: The included articles met most of the study design criteria, but many did not isolate e-health technologies or use power analyses to calculate sample sizes. The interventions reflected a variety of technologies, audiences, and methods, and showed consistent use of theoretical frameworks to guide the interventions. Results regarding support for e-health's effectiveness in PA interventions were mixed and cannot provide definite conclusions. Only seven studies used pure control groups, and of those, four demonstrated support for e-health but the others showed no significant differences. The majority of studies using comparison groups showed no significant differences between conditions. No notable patterns emerged among the studies that did show support for e-health. Conclusions: Future research should utilize more rigorous methods that allow for better comparison across studies, such as power analyses, pure control groups, and objective PA measurements, which could lead to more definitive results regarding e-health's effectiveness for PA interventions.
KW - e-health
KW - technology
KW - telehealth
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80051974911&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80051974911&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/tmj.2011.0013
DO - 10.1089/tmj.2011.0013
M3 - Review article
C2 - 21718092
AN - SCOPUS:80051974911
SN - 1530-5627
VL - 17
SP - 509
EP - 523
JO - Telemedicine and e-Health
JF - Telemedicine and e-Health
IS - 7
ER -