Accounting for victimization: Male professors' ideological positioning in stories of sexual harassment

Jennifer A. Scarduzio, Patricia Geist-Martin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Ideologies constrain and shape the sense that people make of sexual harassment experiences in the workplace. Victims, harassers, and witnesses are all influenced by the discourse that informs the decisions they make in relation to sexual harassment in the workplace. This research examined the implications of ideologies and discourses surrounding sexual harassment through interviews with four male professors from a large, southwestern U.S. university, who describe their experience as victims of sexual harassment.The men's accounts revealed shifts back and forth between several ideological positions as a way to make sense of their experiences, highlighting the impact of hegemonic masculinity, the complicated process of consent, and the contrast between the experiences of male and female victims.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)419-445
Number of pages27
JournalManagement Communication Quarterly
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2010

Keywords

  • Hegemonic masculinity
  • Ideological positioning
  • Male victims
  • Sexual harassment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Strategy and Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Accounting for victimization: Male professors' ideological positioning in stories of sexual harassment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this