Accuracy of self-reported tobacco assessments in a head and neck cancer treatment population

Graham W. Warren, Susanne M. Arnold, Joseph P. Valentino, Thomas J. Gal, Andrew J. Hyland, Anurag K. Singh, Vivek M. Rangnekar, K. Michael Cummings, James R. Marshall, Mahesh R. Kudrimoti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

70 Scopus citations

Abstract

Prospective analysis was performed of self-reported and biochemically confirmed tobacco use in 50 head and neck cancer patients during treatment. With 93.5% compliance to complete weekly self-report and biochemical confirmatory tests, 29.4% of smokers required biochemical assessment for identification. Accuracy increased by 14.9% with weekly vs. baseline self-reported assessments. Data confirm that head and neck cancer patients misrepresent true tobacco use during treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-48
Number of pages4
JournalRadiotherapy and Oncology
Volume103
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2012

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was supported by the University of Kentucky General Clinical Research Center ( M01-RR02602 ). The authors wish to acknowledge Jackie Sims and Laura Reichel for their assistance in conducting research interviews and collecting serum specimens.

Funding

This work was supported by the University of Kentucky General Clinical Research Center ( M01-RR02602 ). The authors wish to acknowledge Jackie Sims and Laura Reichel for their assistance in conducting research interviews and collecting serum specimens.

FundersFunder number
University of Kentucky General Clinical Research CenterM01-RR02602
National Center for Research ResourcesM01RR002602

    Keywords

    • Cotinine
    • Head/neck
    • Radiotherapy
    • Smoking
    • Tobacco

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Hematology
    • Oncology
    • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Accuracy of self-reported tobacco assessments in a head and neck cancer treatment population'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this