TY - GEN
T1 - Accurate measurement of small absorption coefficients
AU - Seybert, A. F.
AU - Han, J.
AU - Herrin, D. W.
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - In this paper procedures for estimating the sound absorption coefficient when the specimen has inherently low absorption are discussed. Examples of this include the measurement of the absorption coefficient of pavements, closed cell foams and other barrier materials whose absorption coefficient is nevertheless required, and the measurement of sound absorption of muffler components such as perforates. The focus of the paper is on (1) obtaining an accurate phase correction and (2) proper correction for tube attenuation when using impedance tube methods. For the latter it is shown that the equations for tube attenuation correction in the standards underestimate the actual tube attenuation, leading to an overestimate of the measured absorption coefficient. This error could be critical, for example, when one is attempting to qualify a facility for the measurement of pass-by noise. In this paper we propose a remedy - to measure the actual tube attenuation and to use this value, as opposed to the value recommended by the standards, to correct the measured sound absorption. We also recommend an alternative way to determine the microphone phase error.
AB - In this paper procedures for estimating the sound absorption coefficient when the specimen has inherently low absorption are discussed. Examples of this include the measurement of the absorption coefficient of pavements, closed cell foams and other barrier materials whose absorption coefficient is nevertheless required, and the measurement of sound absorption of muffler components such as perforates. The focus of the paper is on (1) obtaining an accurate phase correction and (2) proper correction for tube attenuation when using impedance tube methods. For the latter it is shown that the equations for tube attenuation correction in the standards underestimate the actual tube attenuation, leading to an overestimate of the measured absorption coefficient. This error could be critical, for example, when one is attempting to qualify a facility for the measurement of pass-by noise. In this paper we propose a remedy - to measure the actual tube attenuation and to use this value, as opposed to the value recommended by the standards, to correct the measured sound absorption. We also recommend an alternative way to determine the microphone phase error.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881423438&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881423438&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84881423438
SN - 9781627480000
T3 - 14th International Congress on Sound and Vibration 2007, ICSV 2007
SP - 968
EP - 975
BT - 14th International Congress on Sound and Vibration 2007, ICSV 2007
T2 - 14th International Congress on Sound and Vibration 2007, ICSV 2007
Y2 - 9 July 2007 through 12 July 2007
ER -