TY - JOUR
T1 - Activity of piperacillin/tazobactam in combination with amikacin, ciprofloxacin, and trovafloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa by time-kill
AU - Burgess, David S.
AU - Hastings, Rhonda W.
PY - 2000/9
Y1 - 2000/9
N2 - Pseudomonal infections have a high rate of morbidity and mortality, thus combination therapy is often recommended. We compared the activity of piperacillin/tazobactam in combination with amikacin, ciprofloxacin, or trovafloxacin at different concentrations against P. aeruginosa using time- kill methodology. MICs were determined for 4 clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa. Time-kill studies were conducted over 24 h. Each drug was tested alone and in combination using the following concentrations: 2 and 1/4, 1/4 and 2, and 1/4 and 1/4 x MIC of piperacillin/tazobactam and amikacin, ciprofloxacin, or trovafloxacin. Combinations were classified as synergistic, indifferent, or antagonistic. Synergy was defined as ≥ 2-log10 decrease in CFU/mL at 24 h with the combination when compared to the most active single agent and the number of surviving organisms for the antimicrobial combination was ≥2-log10 less than the initial inoculum. The MICs for piperacillin/tazobactam, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, and trovafloxacin, ranged from 4/4-512/4, 0.5-4, 0.125-4, and 0.5-8 μg/mL, respectively. Fifty eight percent of the combinations using concentrations of 1/4 x MIC of piperacillin/tazobactam and 2 x MIC of amikacin, ciprofloxacin, and trovafloxacin or 2 x MIC of piperacillin/tazobactam and 1/4 x MIC of amikacin, ciprofloxacin, and trovafloxacin were synergistic. Although no differences existed in synergistic activity between the two combinations, the 1/4 and 2 x MIC maintained colony counts below the limit of quantification for 24 h for a significantly greater percentage of isolates than the 2 and 1/4 x MIC combinations (75 and 25%, respectively; p = 0.04). Overall, synergy was most frequently (42%) noted with the piperacillin/tazobactam and amikacin combinations followed by 33 and 8% of the piperacillin/tazobactam and trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin combinations. No combination demonstrated antagonism. Further more extensive studies are necessary to determine clinical significance. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.
AB - Pseudomonal infections have a high rate of morbidity and mortality, thus combination therapy is often recommended. We compared the activity of piperacillin/tazobactam in combination with amikacin, ciprofloxacin, or trovafloxacin at different concentrations against P. aeruginosa using time- kill methodology. MICs were determined for 4 clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa. Time-kill studies were conducted over 24 h. Each drug was tested alone and in combination using the following concentrations: 2 and 1/4, 1/4 and 2, and 1/4 and 1/4 x MIC of piperacillin/tazobactam and amikacin, ciprofloxacin, or trovafloxacin. Combinations were classified as synergistic, indifferent, or antagonistic. Synergy was defined as ≥ 2-log10 decrease in CFU/mL at 24 h with the combination when compared to the most active single agent and the number of surviving organisms for the antimicrobial combination was ≥2-log10 less than the initial inoculum. The MICs for piperacillin/tazobactam, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, and trovafloxacin, ranged from 4/4-512/4, 0.5-4, 0.125-4, and 0.5-8 μg/mL, respectively. Fifty eight percent of the combinations using concentrations of 1/4 x MIC of piperacillin/tazobactam and 2 x MIC of amikacin, ciprofloxacin, and trovafloxacin or 2 x MIC of piperacillin/tazobactam and 1/4 x MIC of amikacin, ciprofloxacin, and trovafloxacin were synergistic. Although no differences existed in synergistic activity between the two combinations, the 1/4 and 2 x MIC maintained colony counts below the limit of quantification for 24 h for a significantly greater percentage of isolates than the 2 and 1/4 x MIC combinations (75 and 25%, respectively; p = 0.04). Overall, synergy was most frequently (42%) noted with the piperacillin/tazobactam and amikacin combinations followed by 33 and 8% of the piperacillin/tazobactam and trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin combinations. No combination demonstrated antagonism. Further more extensive studies are necessary to determine clinical significance. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033798281&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033798281&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0732-8893(00)00162-0
DO - 10.1016/S0732-8893(00)00162-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 11025182
AN - SCOPUS:0033798281
SN - 0732-8893
VL - 38
SP - 37
EP - 41
JO - Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
JF - Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
IS - 1
ER -