TY - JOUR
T1 - Advancing an epidural catheter 10 cm then retracting it 5 cm is no more effective than advancing it 5 cm
AU - Cartagena, Rafael
AU - Gaiser, Robert R.
PY - 2005/11
Y1 - 2005/11
N2 - Study Objective: To determine whether threading an epidural catheter 10 cm then retracting it 5 cm affects its intravascular placement and paresthesias. Design: Prospective randomized study. Setting: Labor and Delivery Unit, University Medical Center. Patients: Eighty parturients. Interventions: All patients received epidural anesthesia. Patients were randomized to 1 of 2 groups: threading the epidural catheter 5 cm (5-cm group) or threading the epidural catheter 10 cm and retracting 5 cm (10-cm group). In the 10-cm group, the epidural catheter was threaded 10 cm and pulled back 5 cm. In the 5-cm group, the epidural catheter was threaded 5 cm. Measurements and Main Results: Placement of the epidural catheter intravascularly, the presence of a paresthesia, and bilateral sensory levels were measured. There was no difference in the frequency of intravascular placement between 10- and 5-cm groups, 10.2% vs 7.5%, respectively. Although not statistically significant, there was a trend toward a higher frequency of paresthesia in the 10-cm group, 15.4% vs 7.5%, and a lower frequency of uneven sensory levels in the 10-cm group, 15% vs 2.6%. Conclusions: There is no clear clinical benefit or disadvantage to threading an epidural catheter 10 cm into the epidural space then withdrawing it 5 cm. Further study is warranted.
AB - Study Objective: To determine whether threading an epidural catheter 10 cm then retracting it 5 cm affects its intravascular placement and paresthesias. Design: Prospective randomized study. Setting: Labor and Delivery Unit, University Medical Center. Patients: Eighty parturients. Interventions: All patients received epidural anesthesia. Patients were randomized to 1 of 2 groups: threading the epidural catheter 5 cm (5-cm group) or threading the epidural catheter 10 cm and retracting 5 cm (10-cm group). In the 10-cm group, the epidural catheter was threaded 10 cm and pulled back 5 cm. In the 5-cm group, the epidural catheter was threaded 5 cm. Measurements and Main Results: Placement of the epidural catheter intravascularly, the presence of a paresthesia, and bilateral sensory levels were measured. There was no difference in the frequency of intravascular placement between 10- and 5-cm groups, 10.2% vs 7.5%, respectively. Although not statistically significant, there was a trend toward a higher frequency of paresthesia in the 10-cm group, 15.4% vs 7.5%, and a lower frequency of uneven sensory levels in the 10-cm group, 15% vs 2.6%. Conclusions: There is no clear clinical benefit or disadvantage to threading an epidural catheter 10 cm into the epidural space then withdrawing it 5 cm. Further study is warranted.
KW - Anesthesia
KW - Catheter
KW - Epidural
KW - Intravascular placement
KW - Paresthesias
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27744508342&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27744508342&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.08.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.08.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 16297752
AN - SCOPUS:27744508342
SN - 0952-8180
VL - 17
SP - 528
EP - 530
JO - Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
JF - Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
IS - 7
ER -