Abstract
Examining the rhetorical responses of Hongkongers toward the influx of mainland Chinese maternal tourists, this article investigates citizenship claims made by a citizenry that is locally and culturally powerful but is transnationally and sociopolitically marginalized. By analyzing how alienizing discourse circulates and gains political valence through social media and popular cultural discourse, this article demonstrates that citizenship—particularly at a moment of national crisis—is intimately tied to and regulated by collective affects that could foreclose alternative and more inclusive articulations of membership.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 410-433 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | Rhetoric Society Quarterly |
Volume | 46 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 19 2016 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2016 The Rhetoric Society of America.
Keywords
- affect and emotion
- citizenship
- national identity
- rhetoric
- transnationalism
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Communication
- Linguistics and Language