Against creativity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations


According to the Supreme Court, copyright requires both independent creation and creativity. The independent creation requirement provides that copyright cannot protect an element of a work of authorship that is copied from a previously existing work. But scholars disagree about the meaning of and justification for the creativity requirement. The creativity requirement should be abandoned because it is irrelevant to the scope of copyrightable subject matter and distorts copyright doctrine by encouraging inefficient "creativity rhetoric." The purpose of copyright is to encourage the production of economically valuable works of authorship, not creativity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)426-454
Number of pages29
JournalNew York University Journal of Law and Liberty
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law


Dive into the research topics of 'Against creativity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this