Abstract
Various soil health indicators that measure a chemically defined fraction of nitrogen (N) or a process related to N cycling have been proposed to quantify the potential to supply N to crops, a key soil function. We evaluated five N indicators (total soil N, autoclavable citrate extractable N, water-extractable organic N, potentially mineralizable N, and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase activity) at 124 sites with long-term experiments across North America evaluating a variety of managements. We found that 59%–81% of the variation in N indicators was among sites, with indicator values decreasing with temperature and increasing with precipitation and clay content. The N indicators increased from 6%–39% in response to decreasing tillage, cover cropping, retaining residue, and applying organic sources of nutrients. Overall, increasing the quantity of organic inputs, whether from increased residue retention, cover cropping, or rotations with higher biomass, resulted in higher values of the N indicators. Although N indicators responded to management in similar ways, the analysis cost and availability of testing laboratories is highly variable. Further, given the strong relationships of the N indicators with carbon (C) indicators, measuring soil organic C along with 24-h potential C mineralization could be used as a proxy for N supply instead of measuring potentially mineralizable N or any other N indicator directly.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 868-884 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Soil Science Society of America Journal |
Volume | 87 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jul 1 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Names of laboratories and equipment were given to provide specific information and do not constitute endorsement by the authors. We would like to thank Cornell Soil Health Laboratory, Soil Water and Environmental Lab at The Ohio State University, and Ward Laboratories for performing analysis on samples and their contributions to this study. The NAPESHM project is part of a broader effort titled, “Assessing and Expanding Soil Health for Production, Economic, and Environmental Benefits.” The project is funded by the Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research (grant ID 523926), General Mills, and The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation. The content of this publication is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research. The authors acknowledge the following individuals and groups for their contribution to the long‐term research sites: William Bryan, Joshua Heitman, April Leytem, Mark Liebig, Deanna Osmond, Michael Thompson, the Center for Environmental Farming Systems in Goldsboro NC (Melissa Bell, Nancy Creamer, Alan Franzluebbers, Tomas Moreno, Paul Mueller, Chris Reberg‐Horton), and C.S. Tan, T.W. Welacky, D. Lawrence, M.R. Reeb, M. Soultani, and K. Rinas from Harrow Research and Development Center, Agriculture and Agri‐Food Canada. Support for the sampling by Michigan State University was provided by the U.S. National Science Foundation's Long‐term Ecological Research program at the Kellogg Biological Station (DEB 1832042), the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Long‐term Agroecosystem Research program, and MSU AgBioResearch.
Funding Information:
Names of laboratories and equipment were given to provide specific information and do not constitute endorsement by the authors. We would like to thank Cornell Soil Health Laboratory, Soil Water and Environmental Lab at The Ohio State University, and Ward Laboratories for performing analysis on samples and their contributions to this study. The NAPESHM project is part of a broader effort titled, “Assessing and Expanding Soil Health for Production, Economic, and Environmental Benefits.” The project is funded by the Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research (grant ID 523926), General Mills, and The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation. The content of this publication is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research. The authors acknowledge the following individuals and groups for their contribution to the long-term research sites: William Bryan, Joshua Heitman, April Leytem, Mark Liebig, Deanna Osmond, Michael Thompson, the Center for Environmental Farming Systems in Goldsboro NC (Melissa Bell, Nancy Creamer, Alan Franzluebbers, Tomas Moreno, Paul Mueller, Chris Reberg-Horton), and C.S. Tan, T.W. Welacky, D. Lawrence, M.R. Reeb, M. Soultani, and K. Rinas from Harrow Research and Development Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Support for the sampling by Michigan State University was provided by the U.S. National Science Foundation's Long-term Ecological Research program at the Kellogg Biological Station (DEB 1832042), the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Long-term Agroecosystem Research program, and MSU AgBioResearch.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Soil Science Society of America Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Soil Science Society of America.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Soil Science