An expert review of clozapine in Latin American countries: Use, monitoring, and pharmacovigilance

Trino Baptista, Mariano Motuca, Ana Serrano, Alirio Perez Lo Presti, Alberto Fernandez-Arana, Ismael Olmos, Albis Pabon, Juan Genaro Ayala Yepez, Gabriel de Jesus Alejo Galarza, Nuria Monserrat Rivera Ramirez, Helio Elkis, Emilio J. Sanz, Carlos De Las Cuevas, Jose de Leon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

There is growing interest in clozapine clinical use, monitoring, and research, particularly adverse drug reactions (ADRs) other than agranulocytosis. In this study we focused on clozapine pharmacovigilance. Hence, we contacted clinicians and researchers in Latin America and requested information about local psychiatric services, clozapine availability, clinical use, and ADR monitoring with the VigiBase system. Only two countries have the minimum recommended number of psychiatric beds (15 per 100,000 residents): Uruguay (N = 34.9) and Argentina (N = 17). Bolivia is the only country where clozapine is unavailable. Nine out of twenty countries (45 %) reported ADRs to VigiBase. Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and Mexico published national guidelines for schizophrenia treatment. Chile is the sole country with clozapine clinics with drug serum monitoring. Ethnicity-related drug titration in not described in package inserts in any country. We examined in detail the 9 most frequent and important clozapine ADRs in the worldwide database (pneumonia, sudden death, cardiac arrest, agranulocytosis, myocarditis, constipation, arrhythmia, seizure, and syncope). These 9 ADRs led to 294 reports with fatal outcomes in Argentina (N = 3), Brazil (N = 3), Chile (N = 2), and Peru (N = 1). Agranulocytosis was reported from 7 countries: constipation or seizures from 8 countries. Only two countries reported pneumonia and one country reported myocarditis. The number of clozapine reports in VigiBase has no relationship to the country's population. All Latin American countries underreport clozapine associated ADRs. Latin American governments, along with clinicians, researchers, and educators, should optimize clozapine use and monitoring for the benefit of people with severe mental and some neurological disorders.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)60-65
Number of pages6
JournalSchizophrenia Research
Volume268
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier B.V.

Funding

The authors are indebted to the national centers which make up the World Health Organization (WHO) Program for International Drug Monitoring and contribute reports to VigiBase at the Uppsala Monitoring Centre. The information comes from a variety of sources, and the probability that the suspected adverse effect is drug-related is not the same in all cases. However, the opinions and conclusions of this study are not necessarily those of the various centers nor of the WHO. The authors are grateful to Marina Sagud, M.D. who helped Jose de Leon, MD to develop the first version of the country questionnaire for a similar study in Eastern Europe. The authors also thank Andrea Mesen, MD, PhD from Costa Rica for kindly sending us the requested information.

FundersFunder number
World Health Organization

    Keywords

    • Adverse effects
    • Antipsychotic agents
    • Clozapine
    • Hospitals
    • Pharmacovigilance
    • Risk assessment

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Psychiatry and Mental health
    • Biological Psychiatry

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'An expert review of clozapine in Latin American countries: Use, monitoring, and pharmacovigilance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this