An Exploratory Study of How Teacher Type and Experience Relate to Perceptions of Adding More Recess during the School Day

Heather Erwin, Michelle Thornton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study was to explore elementary faculty perceptions of adding more recess during the school day. Secondarily, authors compared perceptions by teacher type and years of experience. Participants were 25 teachers (representing all grade levels and areas) from one elementary school in the southeastern region of the United States. Participants completed a questionnaire regarding their perceptions toward recess before/after implementing an additional recess period. No significant differences appeared when analyzing data from all participants. However, when examining data by teacher type and experience, a negative statistical significance was found. A school policy of two recess periods per day was perceived less positively by elementary faculty after implementation, and teachers with more experience viewed it more negatively than teachers with less experience. Grade-level teachers were less enthusiastic toward the inclusion of more recess time than administrators, aides, and special area teachers. As school personnel make shifts in school policy related to recess offerings, professional development on the positive outcomes can be geared toward more experienced and grade-level teachers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)206-215
Number of pages10
JournalChildren and Schools
Volume44
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
VC 2022 National Association of Social Workers.

Keywords

  • learning
  • physical activity
  • recess

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An Exploratory Study of How Teacher Type and Experience Relate to Perceptions of Adding More Recess during the School Day'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this