Analysis of 1,115 patients tested for MET amplifi cation and therapy response in the MD anderson phase I clinic

Denis L.F. Jardim, Chad Tang, Debora De Melo Gagliato, Gerald S. Falchook, Kenneth Hess, Filip Janku, Siqing Fu, Jennifer J. Wheler, Ralph G. Zinner, Aung Naing, Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, Vijay Kumar Holla, Marylin M. Li, Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri, Raja Luthra, Ravi Salgia, Razelle Kurzrock, Funda Meric-Bernstam, David S. Hong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

76 Scopus citations

Abstract

Results: Of 1,115 patients, 29 (2.6%) had MET amplification. The highest prevalence was in adrenal (2 of 13; 15%) and renal (4 of 28; 14%) tumors, followed by gastroesophageal (6%), breast (5%), and ovarian cancers (4%). MET amplification was associated with adenocarcinomas (P= 0.007), high-grade tumors (P = 0.003), more sites of metastasis, higher BRAF mutation, and PTEN loss (all P < 0.05). Median overall survival was 7.23 and 8.62 months for patients with and without a MET amplification, respectively (HR = 1.12;95% confidence intervals, 0.83-1.85; P = 0.29). Among the 20 patients with MET amplification treated on a phase I protocol, 4 (20%) achieved a partial response with greatest response rate on agents targeting angiogenesis (3 of 6, 50%).Nopatient treated with a c-MET inhibitor (0 of 7) achieved an objective response.

Conclusion: MET amplification was detected in 2.6% of patients with solid tumors and was associated with adenocarcinomas, high-grade histology, and higher metastatic burden. Concomitant alterations in additional pathways (BRAF mutation and PTEN loss) and variable responses on targeted therapies, including c-MET inhibitors, suggest that further studies are needed to target this population.

Purpose: This study aimed to assess MET amplification among different cancers, association with clinical factors and genetic aberrations and targeted therapy response modifications.

Experimental Design: From May 2010 to November 2012, samples from patients with advanced tumors referred to the MD Anderson Phase I Clinic were analyzed for MET gene amplification by FISH. Patient demographic, histologic characteristics, molecular characteristics, and outcomes in phase I protocols were compared per MET amplification status.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6336-6345
Number of pages10
JournalClinical Cancer Research
Volume20
Issue number24
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 15 2014

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
©2014 AACR.

Funding

FundersFunder number
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
National Childhood Cancer Registry – National Cancer InstituteP30CA016672

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Medicine

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of 1,115 patients tested for MET amplifi cation and therapy response in the MD anderson phase I clinic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this