Another Look at Systemic Neonicotinoid Applications for Emerald Ash Borer Suppression

David G. Olson, Lee H. Townsend, Eric Roemmele, Lynne K. Rieske

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Emerald ash borer (EAB, Agrilus planipennis) is an invasive phloem feeder from East Asia that has killed millions of ash trees in North America. Currently, effective options for individual tree protection are limited to systemic insecticides, in particular neonicotinoids, which have come under increased scrutiny for their nontarget effects. In this study, green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) trees were treated with two neonicotinoid insecticides, imidacloprid and dinotefuran, at full and half label rates based on trunk diameter to evaluate residues and efficacy. Analyzing the leaf, stem, and root tissues, there was no difference in insecticide residues between application rates within each tissue type. However, there were significantly higher residues of imidacloprid in root tissue compared to other plant tissues, and dinotefuran applied at the full label rate resulted in lower residues in stem phloem tissue. Additionally, insecticide-treated stems were artificially infested with EAB eggs to measure larval success (survival and growth). EAB larvae consumed less phloem in treated trees compared to untreated controls. These findings suggest that, in small-diameter ash, lower than label-recommended doses may be a viable component of an integrated management plan for EAB.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)347-357
Number of pages11
JournalArboriculture and Urban Forestry
Volume46
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
©2020 International Society of Arboriculture.

Funding

The authors thank Eastern Kentucky University for allowing us to conduct this project and access sampling sites at Taylor Fork Ecological Area. We also thank Katherine Hagan, Mitch Hughes, Beth Kyre, Hannah Moore, and Samuel Rivers for assistance with field and laboratory work. Anthony Lagalante (Villanova University) analyzed plant tissue samples. Matthew Rutledge and Eva Loveland assisted with the statistical analyses. Kenneth Haynes and Daniel Potter provided feedback on early versions of the manuscript. This is publication number 18-08-060 of the Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station and is published with the approval of the director. This work is supported by the Kentucky Division of Forestry and the USDA Forest Service through a Landscape Scale Restoration Grant, and by McIntire Stennis Funds under 2351197000. The authors thank Eastern Kentucky University for allowing us to conduct this project and access sampling sites at Taylor Fork Ecological Area. We also thank Katherine Hagan, Mitch Hughes, Beth Kyre, Hannah Moore, and Samuel Rivers for assistance with field and laboratory work. Anthony Lagalante (iV llanova University) analyzed plant tissue samples. Matthew Rutledge and Eva Loveland assisted with the statistical analyses. Kenneth Haynes and Daniel Potter provided feedback on early versions of the manuscript. This is publication number 18-08-060 of the Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station and is published with the approval of the director. This work is supported by the Kentucky Division of Forestry and the USDA Forest Service through a Landscape Scale Restoration Grant, and by McIntire Stennis Funds under 2351197000.

FundersFunder number
KENTUCKY DIVISION OF FORESTRY
U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Forest Service2351197000
Villanova University18-08-060
Eastern Kentucky, University
Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station

    Keywords

    • Agrilus planipennis
    • Dinotefuran
    • Fraxinus
    • Imidacloprid

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Forestry
    • Ecology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Another Look at Systemic Neonicotinoid Applications for Emerald Ash Borer Suppression'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this