Application review

Thomas F. Hilton; Carl G. Leukefeld

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01301-1_6

Application review

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

Abstract

Chapter 4 addressed the first half of the Application Process: Ideas, Planning, and Forms. Chapter 5 addressed Application Content. This chapter continues the application cycle by focusing on Peer Review. We describe the stress-inducing peer review process so you can be strategic in how you put forth your case for funding to maximize the technical appeal to reviewers and suggest ways to use reviewer feedback to improve competitiveness for revisions for reapplication. It ends with a brief overview of approaches to reviews by other US federal agencies.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	SpringerBriefs in Public Health
Pages	77-89
Number of pages	13
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01301-1_6
State	Published - 2019

Publication series

Name	SpringerBriefs in Public Health
ISSN (Print)	2192-3698
ISSN (Electronic)	2192-3701

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019.

Keywords

Application assignment
DOD
NASA
NSF
Not discussed
Review meetings
Scoring
Unscored
VA

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Health Policy
Health Informatics
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1007/978-3-030-01301-1_6

Cite this

@inbook{f9ac8254d1fd46bcb7fc87fc385032c0,

title = "Application review",

abstract = "Chapter 4 addressed the first half of the Application Process: Ideas, Planning, and Forms. Chapter 5 addressed Application Content. This chapter continues the application cycle by focusing on Peer Review. We describe the stress-inducing peer review process so you can be strategic in how you put forth your case for funding to maximize the technical appeal to reviewers and suggest ways to use reviewer feedback to improve competitiveness for revisions for reapplication. It ends with a brief overview of approaches to reviews by other US federal agencies.",

keywords = "Application assignment, DOD, NASA, NSF, Not discussed, Review meetings, Scoring, Unscored, VA",

author = "Hilton, {Thomas F.} and Leukefeld, {Carl G.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019.",

year = "2019",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-01301-1_6",

language = "English",

series = "SpringerBriefs in Public Health",

pages = "77--89",

booktitle = "SpringerBriefs in Public Health",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Application review

AU - Hilton, Thomas F.

AU - Leukefeld, Carl G.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Chapter 4 addressed the first half of the Application Process: Ideas, Planning, and Forms. Chapter 5 addressed Application Content. This chapter continues the application cycle by focusing on Peer Review. We describe the stress-inducing peer review process so you can be strategic in how you put forth your case for funding to maximize the technical appeal to reviewers and suggest ways to use reviewer feedback to improve competitiveness for revisions for reapplication. It ends with a brief overview of approaches to reviews by other US federal agencies.

AB - Chapter 4 addressed the first half of the Application Process: Ideas, Planning, and Forms. Chapter 5 addressed Application Content. This chapter continues the application cycle by focusing on Peer Review. We describe the stress-inducing peer review process so you can be strategic in how you put forth your case for funding to maximize the technical appeal to reviewers and suggest ways to use reviewer feedback to improve competitiveness for revisions for reapplication. It ends with a brief overview of approaches to reviews by other US federal agencies.

KW - Application assignment

KW - DOD

KW - NASA

KW - NSF

KW - Not discussed

KW - Review meetings

KW - Scoring

KW - Unscored

KW - VA

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056158192&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056158192&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-01301-1_6

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-01301-1_6

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85056158192

T3 - SpringerBriefs in Public Health

SP - 77

EP - 89

BT - SpringerBriefs in Public Health

ER -

Application review

Abstract

Publication series

Bibliographical note

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this