TY - JOUR
T1 - Applying ecological perspectives to adolescent sexual health in the United States
T2 - Rhetoric or reality?
AU - Salazar, Laura F.
AU - Bradley, Erin L.P.
AU - Younge, Sinead N.
AU - Daluga, Nichole A.
AU - Crosby, Richard A.
AU - Lang, Delia L.
AU - Diclemente, Ralph J.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - This study sought to determine the perspective taken toward understanding adolescent sexual risk behaviors and related biological outcomes (i.e. pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases) since 1990. We content analyzed 324 abstracts representing observational research published between January 1990 and December 2007 for inclusion of ecological (environmental) factors, level of analysis, sample composition and type of behavioral and biological outcomes. A majority (95%) of studies included individual characteristics; half were void of any environmental factors. Of those including environmental factors, 27% included familial, 23% community, 13% relational and 3% societal factors. Most (80%) were positioned at the individual level of analysis. Samples were diverse (43%) and of mixed gender (71%). Biomarkers of sexually transmitted diseases (7.5%) or pregnancy outcomes (2%) were rare. Ecological inclusion was not related to year of publication. Despite the rhetoric highlighting, the importance of an ecological perspective in understanding adolescent sexual risk behavior, much published research, excludes environmental influences.
AB - This study sought to determine the perspective taken toward understanding adolescent sexual risk behaviors and related biological outcomes (i.e. pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases) since 1990. We content analyzed 324 abstracts representing observational research published between January 1990 and December 2007 for inclusion of ecological (environmental) factors, level of analysis, sample composition and type of behavioral and biological outcomes. A majority (95%) of studies included individual characteristics; half were void of any environmental factors. Of those including environmental factors, 27% included familial, 23% community, 13% relational and 3% societal factors. Most (80%) were positioned at the individual level of analysis. Samples were diverse (43%) and of mixed gender (71%). Biomarkers of sexually transmitted diseases (7.5%) or pregnancy outcomes (2%) were rare. Ecological inclusion was not related to year of publication. Despite the rhetoric highlighting, the importance of an ecological perspective in understanding adolescent sexual risk behavior, much published research, excludes environmental influences.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955258358&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955258358&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/her/cyp065
DO - 10.1093/her/cyp065
M3 - Article
C2 - 20007196
AN - SCOPUS:77955258358
SN - 0268-1153
VL - 25
SP - 552
EP - 562
JO - Health Education Research
JF - Health Education Research
IS - 4
ER -