Appropriateness of term limits for administrative appointments in pharmacy programs

Daniel R. Malcom, Karen Farris, David J. Feola, Peter M. Gannett, Anandi V. Law, Katherine S. O’neal, Francine D. Salinitri, Katherine Tromp, Annesha White

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

The appropriateness of term limits for administrative appointments is a subject of much discussion, not just within pharmacy programs, but in organizations of all types. The prospect of term limits for involves a wide variety of important organizational issues, including succession planning, institutional memory, strategic decision-making, and concepts regarding leadership styles overall. This paper examines both sides of the debate regarding the appropriateness of term limits for administrative appointments. Arguments supporting term limits include the ability for strategic changes in the diversity of leaders as well as a more focused effort on continuous quality improvement. The arguments against term limits focus around the need for stability and the time involved in the development of effective leaders.

Original languageEnglish
Article number7462
JournalAmerican Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Volume84
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Academia
  • Administration
  • Leadership
  • Succession planning
  • Term limits

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
  • Pharmacy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Appropriateness of term limits for administrative appointments in pharmacy programs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this