Arboreal epiphytes in the soil-atmosphere interface: how often are the biggest “buckets” in the canopy empty?

Hailey Hargis, Sybil G. Gotsch, Philipp Porada, Georgianne W. Moore, Briana Ferguson, John T. Van Stan

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Arboreal epiphytes (plants residing in forest canopies) are present across all major climate zones and play important roles in forest biogeochemistry. The substantial water storage capacity per unit area of the epiphyte “bucket” is a key attribute underlying their capability to influence forest hydrological processes and their related mass and energy flows. It is commonly assumed that the epiphyte bucket remains saturated, or near-saturated, most of the time; thus, epiphytes (particularly vascular epiphytes) can store little precipitation, limiting their impact on the forest canopy water budget. We present evidence that contradicts this common assumption from (i) an examination of past research; (ii) new datasets on vascular epiphyte and epi-soil water relations at a tropical montane cloud forest (Monteverde, Costa Rica); and (iii) a global evaluation of non-vascular epiphyte saturation state using a process-based vegetation model, LiBry. All analyses found that the external and internal water storage capacity of epiphyte communities is highly dynamic and frequently available to intercept precipitation. Globally, non-vascular epiphytes spend <20% of their time near saturation and regionally, including the humid tropics, model results found that non-vascular epiphytes spend ~1/3 of their time in the dry state (0–10% of water storage capacity). Even data from Costa Rican cloud forest sites found the epiphyte community was saturated only 1/3 of the time and that internal leaf water storage was temporally dynamic enough to aid in precipitation interception. Analysis of the epi-soils associated with epiphytes further revealed the extent to which the epiphyte bucket emptied—as even the canopy soils were often <50% saturated (29–53% of all days observed). Results clearly show that the epiphyte bucket is more dynamic than currently assumed, meriting further research on epiphyte roles in precipitation interception, redistribution to the surface and chemical composition of “net” precipitation waters reaching the surface.

Original languageEnglish
Article number342
JournalGeosciences (Switzerland)
Volume9
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2019

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Funding: Funding for research at the Soltis Center site was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research (DE-SC0010654). Support for ongoing research in the TMCF of Monteverde Costa Rica comes from the from National Science Foundation (IOS Award #1556289 to S.G.G). P.P. gladly appreciates funding by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)—408092731.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Keywords

  • Bromeliad
  • Bryophytes
  • Interception
  • Lichens
  • Non-vascular epiphyte
  • Precipitation
  • Vascular epiphyte
  • Water storage capacity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Arboreal epiphytes in the soil-atmosphere interface: how often are the biggest “buckets” in the canopy empty?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this