Abstract
To determine if fourth-year medical students are as effective as faculty in teaching the physical examination to first-year medical students. DESIGN: Stratified randomization of the first-year students. SETTING: A public medical school. PARTICIPANTS: All 100 first-year medical students in one medical school class were randomly assigned (controlling for gender) to either a faculty or a fourth-year student preceptor for the Physical Examination Module. MAIN RESULTS: The first-year students of faculty preceptors scored no differently on the written examination than the students of the fourth-year medical student preceptors (82.8% vs 80.3%, p = .09) and no differently on a standardized patient practical examination (95.5% vs 95.4%, p = .92). Also, the first-year students rated the two groups of preceptors similarly on an evaluation form, with faculty rated higher on six items and the student preceptors rated higher on six items (all p > .10). The fourth-year student preceptors rated the experience favorably. CONCLUSIONS: Fourth-year medical students were as successful as faculty in teaching first- year medical students the physical examination as measured by first-year student's performances on objective measures and ratings of teaching effectiveness.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 177-181 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Journal of General Internal Medicine |
Volume | 12 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1997 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Supported in part by the Preparing Physicians for the Future Grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Funding
Supported in part by the Preparing Physicians for the Future Grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Preparing Physicians for the Future | |
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation |
Keywords
- education
- physical examination
- preceptors
- small-group teaching
- teaching
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Internal Medicine