TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing residents' clinical performance
T2 - Cumulative results of a four- year study with the objective structured clinical examination
AU - Schwartz, R. W.
AU - Witzke, D. B.
AU - Donnelly, M. B.
AU - Stratton, T.
AU - Blue, A. V.
AU - Sloan, D. A.
AU - Reznick, R. K.
AU - Dayton, M. T.
AU - Harken, A. H.
PY - 1998
Y1 - 1998
N2 - Background. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is an objective method for assessing clinical skills and can be used to identify deficits in clinical skill. During the past 5 years, we have administered 4 OSCEs to all general surgery residents and interns. Methods. Two OSCEs (1993 and 1994) were used as broad-based examinations of the core areas of general surgery; subsequent OSCEs (1995 and 1997) were used as needs assessments. For each year, the reliability of the entire examination was calculated with Cronbach's alpha. A reliability-based minimal competence score (MCS) was defined as the mean performance (in percent) minus the standard error of measurement for each group in 1997 (interns, junior residents, and senior residents). Results. The reliability of each OSCE Was acceptable, ranging from 0. 63 to 0. 91. The MCS during the 4-year period ranged from 45% to 65%. In 1997, 4 interns, 2 junior residents, and 2 senior residents scored below their group's MCS. MCS for the groups increased across training levels in developmental fashion (P < . 05). Conclusions. Given the relatively stable findings observed, we conclude (1) the OSCE can be used to identify group and individual differences reliably in clinical skills, and (2) we continue to use this method to develop appropriate curricular remediation for deficits in both individuals and groups.
AB - Background. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is an objective method for assessing clinical skills and can be used to identify deficits in clinical skill. During the past 5 years, we have administered 4 OSCEs to all general surgery residents and interns. Methods. Two OSCEs (1993 and 1994) were used as broad-based examinations of the core areas of general surgery; subsequent OSCEs (1995 and 1997) were used as needs assessments. For each year, the reliability of the entire examination was calculated with Cronbach's alpha. A reliability-based minimal competence score (MCS) was defined as the mean performance (in percent) minus the standard error of measurement for each group in 1997 (interns, junior residents, and senior residents). Results. The reliability of each OSCE Was acceptable, ranging from 0. 63 to 0. 91. The MCS during the 4-year period ranged from 45% to 65%. In 1997, 4 interns, 2 junior residents, and 2 senior residents scored below their group's MCS. MCS for the groups increased across training levels in developmental fashion (P < . 05). Conclusions. Given the relatively stable findings observed, we conclude (1) the OSCE can be used to identify group and individual differences reliably in clinical skills, and (2) we continue to use this method to develop appropriate curricular remediation for deficits in both individuals and groups.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031830093&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031830093&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0039-6060(98)70135-7
DO - 10.1016/S0039-6060(98)70135-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 9706153
AN - SCOPUS:0031830093
SN - 0039-6060
VL - 124
SP - 307
EP - 312
JO - Surgery
JF - Surgery
IS - 2
ER -