Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Appalachia Influenced by Surgery Type, Diabetes, and Depression

  • Makenzie L. Barr
  • , Lawrence E. Tabone
  • , Stephanie J. Cox
  • , Cassie Brode
  • , Nova Szoka
  • , I. Mark Olfert
  • , Laura Davisson
  • , Melissa D. Olfert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Most effective treatment for morbid obesity and its comorbidities is bariatric surgery. However, research is limited on weight loss and associated outcomes among patients in Appalachia. The objective of this study was to examine demographic and comorbidity influence on surgical outcomes of this population including age, sex, race, state of residence, education, marital status, body mass index (BMI kg/m2), excess body weight (EBW), percent excess weight loss (%EWL), blood pressure, diagnosed depression, diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2D), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), and laboratory values (i.e., hemoglobin A1c). Methods: A retrospective electronic medical record (EMR) data extraction was performed on N = 582 patients receiving bariatric surgery (laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [RYGB] and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy [SG]) between 10/2013 and 2/2017. Results: Patient population was 92.5% Caucasian, 79.3% female, 62.8% married, 45 ± 11.1 years, 75.8% received RYGB, and 24.2% received SG. Average %EWL from baseline to 1-year follow-up was 68.5 ± 18.4% (n = 224). In final descriptive models, surgery type, diagnosed T2D, HbA1c, and depressive symptoms were significant covariates associated with lower %EWL. Conclusions: Findings suggest patients completing surgery within an Appalachian region have successful surgical outcomes at 1-year post-surgery, as indicated by significant reductions of > 50% EWL, regardless of other covariates. Results suggest that bariatric programs should consider paying special consideration to patients with T2D or depressive symptoms to improve outcomes. Results have potential to inform future prospective studies and aid in guiding specific interventions tailored to address needs of this unique population.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1222-1228
Number of pages7
JournalObesity Surgery
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 15 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, The Author(s).

Funding

Funding This work was supported by the West Virginia Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station WVA00689 and WVA00721. All researchers who assisted with this project and university staff who assisted with access to charts are acknowledged. Researchers thank Rebecca Hagedorn, Madison Santella, Rachel Wattick, Tim Waanders, and Camille Charlier for assistance in data collection.

FundersFunder number
Office of Statistics, West Virginia Agriculture and Forestry Experiment Station, West Virginia University, 4100 Agricultural Sciences Building, P.O. Box 6108, Morgantown, WV 26506-6108, USAWVA00721, WVA00689
National Institute of General Medical Sciences DP2GM119177 Sophie Dumont National Institute of General Medical SciencesU54GM104942
Camille and Henry Dreyfus Foundation

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • Appalachia
    • Bariatric surgery
    • Obesity
    • Outcomes

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Surgery
    • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
    • Nutrition and Dietetics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Appalachia Influenced by Surgery Type, Diabetes, and Depression'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this