Abstract
One essential requirement for the development and vitality of a discipline is a network of channels for knowledge dissemination. These channels, such as scholarly journals, furnish not only a means for knowledge sharing, but also for knowledge generation by the discipline's community of researchers. In the field of operations management (OM), there have been several studies that have sought to rank journals relevant to OM research, using opinion surveys, citation analyses, and author affiliations. However, each of these methods has some limitations. This paper adopts a new approach for discerning journal publication patterns in the OM field. It is based on an examination of the actual publishing behaviors of all full-time, tenured OM researchers at a sizable set of leading research universities in the US. This behavior-based methodology provides three metrics that individually, and in tandem, give a basis for rating publication outlets for OM research in terms of their relative importance. The ratings can be used by scholars and administrators to assist in monitoring, disseminating, and evaluating OM research outlets.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 167-178 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Omega |
Volume | 38 |
Issue number | 3-4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2010 |
Keywords
- Bibliometrics
- Knowledge dissemination
- Operations management journals
- Operations management researchers
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Strategy and Management
- Management Science and Operations Research
- Information Systems and Management