Behavioral or nutritional drive: which motivation affects rates of food grinding in CD1 mice?

B. N. Gaskill, H. Davis, R. P. Gosselin, J. P. Garner, J. S. Radcliffe, L. A. Robbins, K. R. Pritchett-Corning

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Wire mouse feeders used in laboratory mouse cages typically hold enough food to feed 5 mice for two weeks. However, some mice gnaw the food provided into powder, which they do not ingest. The ground-up food fills the cage, resulting in miscalculations of food consumption, welfare issues with blocked water valves and frequent cage handling, more frequent cage changes, and economic issues of food wastage. There is a dearth of studies attempting to understand the causes behind food grinding behavior. This study, following on from previous work, sought to determine if the motivations behind food grinding were related to a mouse's innate behavioral drive to gnaw or rather a nutritional drive to seek out macronutrient components in the feed. We replicated previous results where high fat treatments (either shell-on sunflower seeds or a diet with macronutrient equivalence to a sunflower kernel), but not the method of delivery of the higher-fat treatments, decreased the amount of ground food produced per cage. Further, the composition of the gnawed food changed over the course of the study, generally with protein increasing and fat decreasing in the gnawed feed, especially after treatments were removed. We also replicated previous results which found differences in the composition of the gnawed feed in comparison to the original diet. These results support the hypothesis that food grinding behavior is driven by a nutritional motivation, not a behavioral one.

Original languageEnglish
Article number106533
JournalApplied Animal Behaviour Science
Volume284
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors

Funding

This research received no specific funding from any agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The parents of the animals used were provided gratis by Charles River Laboratories. Thank you to Haley Davis for her help in sifting orts from the bedding. All animal work was performed at Harvard University. Analysis of food, carcasses, and orts were performed at Purdue University. Analysis of protein and fat of food and discarded food grounds was conducted at Experiment Station Chemical Laboratories at University of Missouri and funded by Stanford University. All animal work was performed at Harvard University. Analysis of food, carcasses, and orts were performed at Purdue University. Analysis of protein and fat of food and discarded food grounds was conducted at Experiment Station Chemical Laboratories at University of Missouri and funded by Stanford University.

FundersFunder number
Purdue Climate Change Research Center, Purdue University
Charles River Laboratories
Stanford Cardiovascular Institute, School of Medicine, Stanford University
Harvard Transdisciplinary Research in Energetics and Cancer Center, Harvard University
University of Missouri – St. Louis

    Keywords

    • Abnormal behavior
    • Enrichment
    • Feeding
    • Mice
    • Refinement

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Food Animals
    • Animal Science and Zoology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Behavioral or nutritional drive: which motivation affects rates of food grinding in CD1 mice?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this