Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Bivalirudin in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, is it the Anticoagulant of Choice?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

For decades, unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been widely used in catheterization laboratories for anticoagulation for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The direct thrombin inhibitors, bivalirudin, has emerged as an alternative to UFH for PCI procedures, due to its lower bleeding risk. More recently, randomized trials and meta-analyses questioned the efficacy of bivalirudin, and demonstrated that bivalirudin might be associated with a higher incidence of ischemic events and in particular stent thrombosis. In this review, we discuss the pharmacology of bivalirudin along with the clinical evidence comparing bivalirudin versus UFH in patients undergoing PCI for various indications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)227-235
Number of pages9
JournalCardiovascular Therapeutics
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords

  • Bivalirudin
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention
  • Revascularization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bivalirudin in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, is it the Anticoagulant of Choice?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this