TY - JOUR
T1 - Blood flow restriction accelerates recruitment during a high-intensity non-volitional task
AU - Richardson, Lyric
AU - Olmos, Alex
AU - Montgomery, Tony
AU - Burleson, Kylie
AU - Succi, Pasquale
AU - Lubiak, Sean M
AU - Dinyer-McNeely, Taylor K
AU - Hammer, Shane M
AU - Bergstrom, Haley C
AU - Hill, Ethan C
AU - Trevino, Michael A
N1 - Thieme. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/6/26
Y1 - 2025/6/26
N2 - This study examined blood flow restriction (BFR) usage and motor unit (MU) behavior of the biceps brachii (BB) during a single high-intensity contraction. Twelve resistance-trained males (25±5 yrs) completed maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVCs) of the elbow flexors, followed by a 70% MVC with (BFR) and without BFR (CON). Surface electromyographic (EMG) signals from the 70% MVCs were decomposed to extract MU: recruitment thresholds (RTs), action potential amplitudes (MUAP
AMPS), and mean firing rates (MFRs). EMG amplitude (EMG
RMS) at 70% MVC was normalized (N-EMG
RMS) to MVC EMG
RMS. Paired samples t-tests compared the y-intercepts and slopes of the MUAP
AMP and MFR vs. RT relationships, and N-EMG
RMS between treatments. For the MUAP
AMP vs. RT relationships, the y-intercepts were greater (p=0.016) for CON than BFR, whereas the slopes were greater (p=0.024) for BFR than CON. For the MFR vs. RT relationships, the y-intercepts were greater (p=0.039) for BFR than CON, whereas the slopes were more negative (p=0.023) for BFR than CON. N-EMG
RMS was greater (p=0.038) for BFR than CON. BFR accelerated higher-threshold MU recruitment, increased lower-threshold MU firing rates, and increased N-EMG
RMS during a single high-intensity muscle action. BFR may be beneficial for accelerating MU recruitment in populations/scenarios where near-maximal efforts are contraindicated.
AB - This study examined blood flow restriction (BFR) usage and motor unit (MU) behavior of the biceps brachii (BB) during a single high-intensity contraction. Twelve resistance-trained males (25±5 yrs) completed maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVCs) of the elbow flexors, followed by a 70% MVC with (BFR) and without BFR (CON). Surface electromyographic (EMG) signals from the 70% MVCs were decomposed to extract MU: recruitment thresholds (RTs), action potential amplitudes (MUAP
AMPS), and mean firing rates (MFRs). EMG amplitude (EMG
RMS) at 70% MVC was normalized (N-EMG
RMS) to MVC EMG
RMS. Paired samples t-tests compared the y-intercepts and slopes of the MUAP
AMP and MFR vs. RT relationships, and N-EMG
RMS between treatments. For the MUAP
AMP vs. RT relationships, the y-intercepts were greater (p=0.016) for CON than BFR, whereas the slopes were greater (p=0.024) for BFR than CON. For the MFR vs. RT relationships, the y-intercepts were greater (p=0.039) for BFR than CON, whereas the slopes were more negative (p=0.023) for BFR than CON. N-EMG
RMS was greater (p=0.038) for BFR than CON. BFR accelerated higher-threshold MU recruitment, increased lower-threshold MU firing rates, and increased N-EMG
RMS during a single high-intensity muscle action. BFR may be beneficial for accelerating MU recruitment in populations/scenarios where near-maximal efforts are contraindicated.
U2 - 10.1055/a-2644-5025
DO - 10.1055/a-2644-5025
M3 - Article
C2 - 40570899
SN - 0172-4622
JO - International Journal of Sports Medicine
JF - International Journal of Sports Medicine
ER -