Abstract
Meso-institutions are weak, intermediate forms of institutions that bridge the gap between institutional disintegration. and the development of new, more firmly established institutions. Meso-institutions lack the stronger behaviour-guiding signs and symbols of more established institutions, but instead contain fragments of former institutions mixed with emerging, but fragile, components of developing institutions. Institutional disintegration leads to a disorienting period characterized by the dissolution of fundamental, widely held ideologies. This offers an opportunity for actions rather than institutions to guide actions. Because meso-institutions are weak, only after actions are repeated will they solidify into specific patterns that may be retrospectively granted legitimacy. Using archival data supplemented by interviews, we identified three meso-institutional occurrences with the phenomenologically based manifestations of fractured ideology, actions as rules and retrospective legitimization.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 81-104 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | Management and Organization Review |
Volume | 3 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2007 |
Keywords
- KEYWORDS China
- institutional theory
- transformation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Business and International Management
- Strategy and Management