Abstract
Although some researchers have argued that religiosity has a deterrent effect on criminal offending in general, and serves as a protective factor against men’s intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration, others have obtained inconsistent or contradictory findings indicating that religiosity per se may be less important than other factors and may be protective only for some groups of men. The present study extends previous research by using measures that gauge multiple dimensions of religiosity to examine its effects on IPV perpetration among a national, community sample of adult men (N = 260). Findings indicate that religiosity is functionally less important than religious self-regulation in reducing men’s likelihood of IPV perpetration, supporting previous research showing that the protective effects of religiosity may be limited to certain groups of men. Implications of the findings for future research are discussed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1974-1997 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | Journal of Family Issues |
Volume | 38 |
Issue number | 14 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 1 2017 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2015, © The Author(s) 2015.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The authors are grateful to the College of Arts and Sciences, University of Kentucky for financial support for this research, authorship.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
University of Kentucky | |
College of Arts and Sciences, Boston University |
Keywords
- intimate partner violence
- religiosity
- religious self-regulation
- risk and protective factors
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)