TY - JOUR
T1 - CAD/CAM conic crowns for predictable retention in implant-supported prostheses
AU - Antonaya-Martin, Jose L.
AU - Rio-Highsmith, Jaime Del
AU - Moreno-Hay, Isabel
AU - Lillo-Rodríguez, Juan C.
AU - Gomez-Polo, Miguel A.
AU - Celemin-Viñuela, Alicia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 by Quintessence Publishing Co Inc.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate CAD/CAM conic crowns to obtain a reversible and predictable retention in implant-supported prostheses. Materials and Methods: Five 1- to 8-degree CAD/CAM abutments and their respective copings (n = 40) were designed and manufactured to measure the retention strength (in N) on a Zwick/Roell testing frame. Results: The mean retention strength values found, in descending order of cone angle, were as follows: 8 degrees, 21.02 N; 7 degrees, 23.16 N, 28 N, and 36.40 N; 6 degrees, 40.46 N; 5 degrees, 66.36 N; 4 degrees, 61.23 and 76.12 N; 3 degrees, 93.44 N, 103.21 N, and 112.04 N; 2 degrees, 154.20 N; and 1 degree, 204.74 N, 261 N, and 293.40 N. These data describe a high-intensity ratio with a curvilinear trend that can be used to develop predictive models. Conclusion: With the limits of this study, it can be concluded that retention strength increased as the cone angle decreased. The data described a curve from which two predictive models were developed to find retention strength from the cone angle used and the cone angle that would be needed to deliver a given retention strength. This study is the first step in searching for an alternative to cemented and screw-retained implant-supported prostheses and new retaining elements in implant-retained prostheses.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate CAD/CAM conic crowns to obtain a reversible and predictable retention in implant-supported prostheses. Materials and Methods: Five 1- to 8-degree CAD/CAM abutments and their respective copings (n = 40) were designed and manufactured to measure the retention strength (in N) on a Zwick/Roell testing frame. Results: The mean retention strength values found, in descending order of cone angle, were as follows: 8 degrees, 21.02 N; 7 degrees, 23.16 N, 28 N, and 36.40 N; 6 degrees, 40.46 N; 5 degrees, 66.36 N; 4 degrees, 61.23 and 76.12 N; 3 degrees, 93.44 N, 103.21 N, and 112.04 N; 2 degrees, 154.20 N; and 1 degree, 204.74 N, 261 N, and 293.40 N. These data describe a high-intensity ratio with a curvilinear trend that can be used to develop predictive models. Conclusion: With the limits of this study, it can be concluded that retention strength increased as the cone angle decreased. The data described a curve from which two predictive models were developed to find retention strength from the cone angle used and the cone angle that would be needed to deliver a given retention strength. This study is the first step in searching for an alternative to cemented and screw-retained implant-supported prostheses and new retaining elements in implant-retained prostheses.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978817890&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978817890&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.11607/ijp.4303
DO - 10.11607/ijp.4303
M3 - Article
C2 - 27148981
AN - SCOPUS:84978817890
SN - 0893-2174
VL - 29
SP - 230
EP - 232
JO - International Journal of Prosthodontics
JF - International Journal of Prosthodontics
IS - 3
ER -