Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Can Alternative Tillage Sequester Carbon Deeper? A Global Synthesis of Deep-Soil Carbon Stocks and Fractions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Alternative tillage (ALT) methods present promising strategies for enhancing soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration, though their effectiveness varies across soil layers and carbon fractions. This global meta-analysis systematically quantifies the effects of various ALT practices on SOC dynamics in topsoil (0–30 cm), subsoil (> 30 cm), and whole profiles, with a focus on microbial biomass carbon (MBC), particulate organic carbon (POC), and mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC). Our findings reveal that while all ALT practices increased whole-profile SOC stocks compared to conventional tillage, their impacts on specific soil layers varied. Deep tillage (DT; +6.3%) and no-tillage (NT; +6.1%) were more effective than reduced tillage (RT; 4.9%) at the whole-profile scale. Notably, assessing SOC changes solely within the topsoil layer may underestimate SOC accrual under ALT, given the positive contributions observed in deeper soil layers (DT: 10.3%; NT: 2.4%). Environmental and management factors also shaped the efficacy of these practices. Soil texture and climate were the primary determinants of SOC responses to NT or RT, whereas DT effectiveness was mainly influenced by nitrogen input and soil texture. Furthermore, ALT practices also altered the concentration of the carbon fractions, with MBC increasing across all ALT practices (22.9%–33.4%). Both NT and RT enhanced MAOC dominance, reflected in a strong MAOC-SOC correlation (r = 0.96). Changes in MBC and POC contributed similarly to SOC stock (r = 0.80 and r = 0.77, respectively) under NT. These findings underscore the importance of whole-profile SOC assessments, offering key insights for optimizing climate-smart tillage strategies to maximize long-term soil health and carbon sequestration.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70251
JournalEuropean Journal of Soil Science
Volume76
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 British Society of Soil Science.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32271899); CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Silviculture, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (KLFES-2033); Major Inicubation project of Shenyang Normal University (ZD202301); The Startup Foundation for Introducing Talent of Nanjing Agricultural University (030/804188); United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture under the Multi-State Hatch project (KY006151-7008110-S1090); USDA-NIFA (Multistate Project S1090) Program under (7008110). This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32271899), Fund of CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Silviculture, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (KLFES-2033), Major Incubation project of Shenyang Normal University (ZD202301), the Startup Foundation for Introducing Talent of Nanjing Agricultural University (030/804188), United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture under the Multi-State Hatch project (Project Number: KY006151-7008110-S1090), K.M. thanks the support of the USDA-NIFA (Multistate Project S1090) Program under (7008110). This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32271899), Fund of CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Silviculture, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (KLFES‐2033), Major Incubation project of Shenyang Normal University (ZD202301), the Startup Foundation for Introducing Talent of Nanjing Agricultural University (030/804188), United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture under the Multi‐State Hatch project (Project Number: KY006151‐7008110‐S1090), K.M. thanks the support of the USDA‐NIFA (Multistate Project S1090) Program under (7008110). This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32271899); CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Silviculture, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (KLFES‐2033); Major Inicubation project of Shenyang Normal University (ZD202301); The Startup Foundation for Introducing Talent of Nanjing Agricultural University (030/804188); United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture under the Multi‐State Hatch project (KY006151‐7008110‐S1090); USDA‐NIFA (Multistate Project S1090) Program under (7008110).

FundersFunder number
CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Silviculture
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Shenyang Normal UniversityZD202301
US Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Agriculture and Food Research InitiativeS1090, 7008110, KY006151‐7008110‐S1090
Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of SciencesKLFES‐2033
Nanjing Agricultural University030/804188
National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)32271899

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
      SDG 13 Climate Action

    Keywords

    • conservation tillage
    • deep tillage
    • microbial biomass carbon
    • mineral-associated organic carbon
    • particulate organic carbon
    • sustainable agriculture

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Soil Science

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Can Alternative Tillage Sequester Carbon Deeper? A Global Synthesis of Deep-Soil Carbon Stocks and Fractions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this