Can bioelectrical stimulation favor orthodontic treatment? A randomized clinical trial to evaluate tooth movement, patient-centered, and inflammatory biomarker outcomes

Paula Caroline Barsi, Mauro Pedrine Santamaria, Renato Corrêa Viana Casarin, Camila Schmidt Stolf, Sílvia Amélia Scudeler Vedovello, Marcelo Lelis Zuppardo, Cristhian Reynaldo Gomez Bautista, Ewerton Zaniboni, Ingrid Fernandes Mathias-Santamaria, Milton Santamaria-Jr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Exogenous bioelectrical stimulation (BES) modulates the bone remodeling. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of BES on clinical, patient-centered, and inflammatory biomarker outcomes of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM). A randomized clinical trial (n = 28) matched for sex (8 men and 6 women in each group) were divided into the control group with a sham device (ie, mouthpiece turned off): OTM + SHAM (mean age of 19.4 years), and the test group: OTM + BES (mean age of 20.1 years). Orthodontic alignment was performed with 0.012-in, 0.014-in, and 0.016-in nickel-titanium wires. BES (10 μA/5 min) was applied immediately after each wire installation, after 48 hours, and once a week until the next wire. The canine-to-canine crowding and little dental irregularity index in the mandibular arch were analyzed. Pain perception was measured at 0, 24, 48, and 72 hours after replacement of the 0.014-in and 0.016-in wires. Inflammatory biomarkers were assessed 48 hours after the replacement of the 0.014-inch wire in gingival fluid. The crowding difference was greater in the OTM + BES than in the OTM + SHAM after 2- and 3-month evaluations and the little index was lower in OTM + BES after 3 months of treatment. During the 0.014-in wire alignment, patient pain perception was lower in the OTM + BES than in the OTM + SHAM at 24 and 48 hours, and lower after 24 hours in the 0.016-in wire alignment. BES treatment increased IL-6 and decreased IL-10 levels in gingival fluid after 48 hours of dental alignment. Exogenous bioelectrical stimulation can accelerate initial OTM, decrease patient pain perception, and modulate inflammatory biomarkers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)464-472
Number of pages9
JournalAJO-DO Clinical Companion
Volume3
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Association of Orthodontists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Assessment and Diagnosis
  • Orthodontics
  • Oral Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can bioelectrical stimulation favor orthodontic treatment? A randomized clinical trial to evaluate tooth movement, patient-centered, and inflammatory biomarker outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this