Can Virtual Influencers Replace Human Influencers in Live-Streaming E-Commerce? An Exploratory Study from Practitioners’ and Consumers’ Perspectives

Anan Wan, Mengtian Jiang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

We conducted expert interviews and a consumer experiment to investigate practitioners’ and consumers’ attitudes toward and adoption of virtual influencers to substitute human influencers in live-streaming e-commerce (LSC). Results of consumer data confirmed practitioner insights that virtual (versus human) influencers generated less positive attitudes and lower levels of perceived warmth, trust, usefulness, and dialogue. Contrary to practitioner insights, consumers did not perceive virtual influencers as more enjoyable, easier to use, more distant, and more likely to generate purchase intention than human influencers. Furthermore, influencer warmth (usefulness) is positively related to influencer attitude (purchase intention). Implications and limitations are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)332-372
Number of pages41
JournalJournal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was partially supported by a research grant from the European Academy of Advertising.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Academy of Advertising.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Marketing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can Virtual Influencers Replace Human Influencers in Live-Streaming E-Commerce? An Exploratory Study from Practitioners’ and Consumers’ Perspectives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this